Saturday, March 19, 2016

Red, White and Blue are the Only Colors that Matter!


The Aryan Nation, the Ku Klux Klan, the Nation of Islam and Black Lives Matters are toxic and have no place in our country.  The Aryan Nation and the Ku Klux Klan are considered hate groups by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and are denounced by most people of all races. The Nation of Islam while listed as a hate group by the SPLC receives little media public attention and condemnation.  The Black Lives Matters organization is, in my opinion, the most dangerous of the hate groups.

It is dangerous because it is very active today, is not considered a hate group by the SPLC and the mainstream media. Its members even have been honored by President Obama.  It defies logic that a group that promotes violence against whites, whose modus operandi is disruption, violence and thuggery is not widely condemned.   Google "black lives matters want to kill whites" and you will find quite a few stories.  Here is one that sums up who they are.

While it is true you will find quite a few stories about the hate that the Black Lives Matters movement is spewing, most of the stories are not written by the mainstream media.  The mainstream media has given them a pass.

Sure, the mainstream media reports when they shut down a Hillary Clinton rally or a Bernie Sanders rally or block traffic to try and silence Donald Trump, but they report without any denouncement of the action of the movement.

Black Lives Matters is trying to infringe upon the right of people to exercise their Constitutional rights of free speech and voting.  Yes, it is true they are trying to intimidate people to stop them from voting for Trump.  

It is extremely important to note that Black Lives Matters does not represent all black people. There are blacks who speak out against the hate of the Black Lives Matter movement.  One is Kevin Jackson whose blog "The Black Sphere"which I read regularly.  Another person who routinely calls out the Black Lives Matters movement is Allen West; someone else I respect and follow.

People like Jackson and West keep me grounded and help me to realize it is not really about race issue but ideology.  These men are conservatives whereas the Black Lives Movement members are liberal and ascribe to thuggery to garner power.

Keep this in mind because it is easy to lump all black people into the Black Lives Matters group when you see mobs of blacks blocking traffic, encouraging riots, encouraging the killing of whites and wiping their butts with the American flag.  These people do not represent all blacks; no more than the Ku Klux Klan represents all whites.

People of all races must band together to fight hate groups and to dispel the lies they spread to promote violence and even race wars.  Know that there are race baiters including our president that want to divide America along the lines of race.  Do not let them do it.  Fight against discrimination at all levels.

Most of all, whether it is the Ku Klux Klan or Black Lives Matters, call out and denounce their hate.  Do not let their threats of riots and murder silence you. Stand tall and proud in your conservative beliefs against the vitriol that is inevitably hurled at you.

Our best weapon against the hate mongers is our vote.  Vote for the candidate that will fight for America.  Support that candidate with your time and contributions.  Together we can change America for the better and make it great again.

Martin Luther King, Jr. wanted us to judge people not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.  I want us to do this too, but also call upon you to align yourself with others not by the color of their skin, but by their political ideology.  A man who believes in upholding the Constitution, who believes in individual freedom and liberty is not white, or black or any other color other than red, white and blue and that is all that matters.


  1. KTT, nailed it again. Dang, I am afraid if you and Kevin keep it up we are going to lose you to a national syndicate. And then we will have to wade though a lot of comments. ;) And I get to post the first comment.

  2. The SPLC is a hate group in itself. I disregard anything they publish.

  3. Ktt, thanks for the reminder, but the problem is here now I don't see it going away anytime soon, but I do see blood in the streets getting worst. As long as we keep letting them break the laws of the land, they will keep doing more of it.

    Oh and good morning to all.

    And you liberal shitheads you are part of the problem, and remember it will be your shit that hits the fan when all hell breaks loose also.You will have zero immunity. Better pull your heads out of your asses.


  4. Samuel Adams, the Father of the American Revolution, specified four criteria (conditions) for citizens to determine when armed rebellion is justified to respond to a tyrannical and illegitimate government.

    Listen to learn more.

    Adams and others of a special committee wrote to the governor of Massachusetts expressing their disapproval of the Shays Riots. Adams specified four criteria for the justification of armed rebellion, which were printed in a circular letter and reproduced by the Massachusetts Gazette on September 12, 1786.

    All four criteria are easily met today, in 2015 America:

    1. When laws are no longer made by a legislature elected by the people.

    Today, no Senator or Congressman write the laws they claim to sponsor or vote for or against. Bills are written by lobbyists and staff members of companies, and sometimes legislators’s staff. However, the majority of laws enacted are through regulations created by unelected bureaucrats of federal and state agencies.

    2. When our form of government exists without our consent.

    For every law Congress enacts, 56 rules and regulations are enacted by unelected federal and state agency bureaucrats. In fact, in 2013, 65 bills were signed into law, but federal agencies enacted 3,659 rules and regulations. Unelected regulatory bureaucrats and/or lobbyists write America’s laws, without citizens’s consent and most often against the will of the people.

    3. Taxation without representation.

    Obamacare is one obvious example. Congress, against the will of the people, imposed a tax by mandating that individuals must purchase from a selection of government-classified health insurance policies. Congress intentionally substituted a mandate by imposing a penalty for anyone who fails to comply. In response, the U.S. Supreme Court denied due process to Americans.

    The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is another obvious example. Its numerous scandals evidence egregious abuse of power committed by unelected bureaucrats. Unelected bureaucrats have been targeting and discriminating against citizens by selectively enforcing regulations Congress did not create.

    In response to the IRS’s abuse of power, an outraged public submitted a record-setting number of comments expressing their opposition to IRS rules. A Center for Competitive Politics study found that 94 percent of public comments opposed some aspects of proposed IRS rules; 87 percent opposed them outright; and of all participants opponents outnumbered supporters by a 2:1 margin. Yet, their opposition has not prevented unelected bureaucrats from enforcing laws Congress did not create.

    4. When authority is no longer derived from ourselves.

    The 2014 $1.1 trillion quid pro quo omnibus spending bill is an obvious example. (It was not a budget; Congress has not submitted or passed a budget since 2009). The Washington Post calculated that each legislator who voted for the bill received approximately $322,000 from the finance/insurance/real estate industries PACs and employees of firms in those industries. It writes, “On average, members of Congress who voted yes received $322,000 from those industries. Those who voted no? $162,000. Here’s the split by party.“ House Speaker John Boehner received the most money for ensuring the bill passed

  5. Obama Legacy

    Latest U.S. Statistical Map:

    Make sure you read to the bottom... Quite an eye opener! (Or should be!)


    New Mexico






    New York


    South Carolina

    These 11 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed!!!

    Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year 2012, between food stamps, housing support, child care, Medicaid and other benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line received $168.00 a day in government support. What's the problem with that much support? Well, the median household income in America is just over $50,000, which averages out to $137.13 a day.

    To put it another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for 40 hour week, while the average job pays $20.00 an hour.


  6. Furthermore:
    There are actually two messages here. The first is very interesting, but the second is absolutely astounding - and explains a lot. A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided very interesting statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization.

    Percentage (%) of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis:
    U.S. 65%
    England 46%
    Canada 42%

    % of patients diagnosed with diabetes -received treatment within 6 months:
    U.S. 93%
    England 15%
    Canada 43%

    % of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months:
    U.S. 90%
    England 15%
    Canada 43%

    % referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month:
    U.S. 77%
    England 40%
    Canada 43%

    Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people:
    U.S. 71
    England 14
    Canada 18

    % of seniors (65+), with low income, who are in "excellent health":
    U.S. 12%
    England 2%
    Canada 6%

    And now...for the last statistic:
    National Health Insurance?
    U.S. NO
    England YES
    Canada YES


  7. Check the last set of statistics!
    The percentage of each past president's cabinet... Who had worked in the private business sector...prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is;
    a real-life business...not a government job.

    Here are the percentages.

    38% T. Roosevelt
    40% Taft
    52% Wilson
    49% Harding
    48% Coolidge
    42% Hoover
    50% F. D. Roosevelt
    50% Truman
    57% Eisenhower
    30% Kennedy
    47% Johnson
    53% Nixon
    42% Ford
    32% Carter
    56% Reagan
    51% G H Bush
    39% Clinton
    55% G W Bush
    8% Obama

    This helps explain the incompetence of this administration: ONLY 8% of them...have ever worked in private business! That's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents!

  8. This helps explain the incompetence of this administration: ONLY 8% of them...have ever worked in private business! That's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents!

    And these people are trying to tell our big corporations how to run their business? How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And, when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers?

    They've spent most of their time in academia, government, and/or non-profit jobs. Or... As "community organizers."

    "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy. Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery" -Winston Churchill. Damn news paper isn't on line yet again, got to pay on time though.

  9. Good morning! Nunya here.

    First day of spring! Good blog, KTT. Spot-on, as usual.

    And Sarge...absolutely. I've been harping about unelected unaccountable bureaucrats creating "laws" for some time now. Way past time to stop that, and to start whittling away at a lot of those 'regulations'. Fixing the broken tax system, and downsizing the IRS to virtually nothing would also save billions of dollars a year.

    Well...let's see what we can find in other news.'s something in the KC Star (Kansas Communist Star) about the Teamsters pension fund going broke from mob influence and other malfeasance, and them blaming government and wanting a federal bailout (which Bernie fully supports, by the way):

    So, lemme see if I got this straight.

    Employees willingly contributed to a mobbed-up criminal union, who skimmed money from both sides, and who financed campaigns of liberals who created laws and regulations that drove the employers out of business, thereby creating too many unemployed workers and a lack of contributions to keep the pension fund afloat...and they want the taxpayers to bail them out?

    That sound about right? sounds "wrong", to me. Maybe the employees should have exerted more control over the unions, instead of the criminal unions exerting complete control over them, and tossing them to the curb? I bet none of those union bosses are ever going to be hurting for money.

    So, then...let's take a break, and look around some more....

  10. Well Nunya you won't have to look far for scandals and corruption.

  11. Charles Krauthammer; The Clinton Foundation

    The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at it's finest, and we are financing it! Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history and their undoing. This is a textbook case on how to hide foreign money sent to you and re-package it, to be used for your own purposes. All tax free.

    Here's how it works:

    1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In their case one in Canada.

    2. Foreign oligarch's and governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 contributed mega millions. I am sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a Canadian charity).

    3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate unidentified individual donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.

    4. The Clinton Foundation, and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits, the identification of individual donors.

    5. The Clinton Foundation, then "spends" some of this money, for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately, experts believe this is on the order of a mere 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay "salaries?" to untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel, etc. Again virtually all tax free, which means you and I are subsidizing it.

    6. The Clinton Foundation with access to the world's best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors" and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.

    7. Net result: foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.

    Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes, as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction required U.S. State Department approval. Guess who was Secretary of State, when the approval, was granted?

    As an aside, imagine how former, Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell feels. That poor schlep, is in jail because he and his wife took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal, but it didn't exactly put U.S. security at risk.

    Sarcasm aside, if you are still not persuaded, this was cleverly structured in order to get unidentified foreign money to the Clintons. Ask yourself this: Why did these foreign interests, funnel money, through a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money directly to the people, organizations and countries in need?

    This is the essence of money laundering and influence peddling. Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000 e-mails was a risk she was willing to take. Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest, and criminal. They are Slick!

    Warning : They could be back in the White House, in January 2017. Do not let it happen. Remember, most people are not well informed. We must somehow inform and educate them.

    Charles Krauthammer; Warm Wishes and May God Bless


  12. Now I understand.....................................


    ABC News executive producer Ian Cameron is married to Susan Rice, National Security Adviser.

    CBS President David Rhodes is the brother of Ben Rhodes, Obama's Deputy National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications.

    ABC News correspondent Claire Shipman is married to former Whitehouse Press Secretary Jay Carney

    ABC News and Univision reporter Matthew Jaffe is married to Katie Hogan, Obama's Deputy Press Secretary

    ABC President Ben Sherwood is the brother of Obama's Special Adviser Elizabeth Sherwood

    CNN President Virginia Moseley is married to former Hillary Clinton's Deputy Secretary Tom Nides.

    And now you know why it is no surprise the media is in Obama's pocket. Think there might be a little bias in the news ? This may also explain the cover up of Benghazi , etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc.,........
    Isn't it interesting that every place you look in Obama's administration people fill positions because of who they know, not what they know or how competent they are ---- and you wonder why our country has so many problems.

  13. Nunya again.

    States' rights to protect ourselves.


    AI,S8:"To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions"

    "To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress"

    Fed gov's "responsibility" to protect citizens from invasion/insurrection. It's not protecting the border, and it's allowing insurrection from liberal fringe groups.

    AI,S10:"No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay."

    Key: "unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay." Since fed gov won't do its duty,the states can protect themselves, militarily, if necessary. Millions streaming over the border of a sovereign nation is an "invasion", puts citizens in "imminent danger".

    AIII,S3:"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

    Feds who REFUSE to protect the Constitution/citizens by allowing an invasion are "adhering to the enemies, and giving them aid and comfort". Treason.

    AIV,S4:"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence."

    It states that it's the Constitutional DUTY to GUARANTEE each state protection against invasion and domestic violence. Failure to do their sworn duty is a breach of Oath of Office, and refusal to uphold the laws/allow the invasion is treason.

    Bill of Rights:

    AII:"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    AX:"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

    The people have a Constitutional right to protect ourselves. If the fed gov refuses to protect the citizens, it is NOT prohibited to have the states/people defend ourselves.

    AXIV,S4:"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void."

    Last sentence. Any debts incurred by insurrection, rebellion (illegal immigration) are illegal/void. States have no obligation to support any illegal in any way, to cover any costs from illegals. Since fed gov fails to stop invasion, states have right to sue fed gov for any costs associated with with illegal, infrastructure, law enforcement, border protection.

    Any state has a Constitutional right to protect itself, if the fed gov refuses. Anyone in fed gov who refuses to enforce laws and/or Oath of Office is committing treason, should be removed and prosecuted.

  14. Nunya again. Just thought I'd throw that in here, with the Arizona anarchists going off.

    Not QUITE sure about that last one (Article XIV, Section 4)....actually. Anyone?

  15. Well Nunya it sure looks like we have a problem now don't it? Also looks like a whole lot of people should be hanged for treason doesn't it.

  16. Hey anyone other than me have a problem with th E -edition Newspaper, No Sunday paper yet and yesterday's didn't show up till after noon, Damn I hate paying for something I didn't get!!!

  17. Yup, ( $9 plus a month). Hey It Doesn't Make me a Bad Person!! Foolish??

    1. I'd suggest you'd switch to LJ World because it is free but your blood pressure might be able to handle the liberal comments.

  18. Ktt, Right I can't stand listening to any Liberals anymore, thank god for the Mute button on the remote, can't hardly read the word on it now I use it so much, oh and Obama hasn't got a pray with me soon as he pops up he is off.

  19. Kevin, How much does it cost to get a damn edit button on your server I am buying....Gees my mind works faster than my damn fingers.

  20. Hey Captain - I am lwatching CNN and the chair was asked about rule 40 - specifically about having to have won 8 states and if they will keep that rule.

    His response was that the 2012 rules committee put that rule in place for the 2012 convention and the 2016 rules committee I'll decide the rules for the 2016 convention.

    So, it seems that the rules can change right before the convention. Rule 40 will be in play.

  21. Hey KTT l left a link on the past blog the other day showing this, with the situation that happened with rule 34 in 2012. You are correct, they can change them up to two weeks before the convention. Fascinating the way the rules can be manipulated.


    I don't want to be off topic, but I have something for you specifically. I believe you have a similar belief and stance on firearms as myself, and your past blogs demonstrate this. Still pondering your "QUESTION" btw.
    Vox released a video about gun violence in America, and it seems the liberals are eating it up by the spoonful. It's purely propaganda, and many have debunked it. But the media is going to push it withe election year upon us. Here's a rebuttal from louder with crowder. I thought it was excellent. My intent is not to change topics, but wanted to share this with you. I think you'll like it, especially if you have seen the Vox video.

    1. Yes, saw your link but wanted to share with Capt that I was hearing from the chairs mouth.

      Any topic is on topic as Sarge says below.

      What question are you pondering?

    2. What law can be made to prevent the current firearm violence we are seeing in America? Or something like that......

    3. Gotcha. If you can answer it don't tell us until you patent it because it will make you a zillionaire.

      We need to educate people about gun safety, address the causes of gun violence like drugs, gangs, lack of family support, mental illness etc. laws are in place and we need to enforce the, not create new laws.

  22. Hammertime there is nothing here that says you have it stay on topic. comment away my man.

    1. Thanks sarge. I understand, but in a sense of how much work kevin and KTT put into these things I will remain respectful to them for it. Just my nature. It's their world here, and I'm just living in it. Lol... One of these days maybe I'll find some time to start my own shifty little version of a blog about raising young men in this crazy world we are in now. Parenting is more difficult these days than it has ever been. That's what my wife and I believe anyway.

  23. Hammertime started to view the video but it is long so I will watch it later but I can tell by what I did watch it is important and everyone should watch it to see how the left lies about gun crime.

  24. Hammertime if you want to live by the cj rules you are in the wrong place, so now you are saying others are disrespectful to Ktt and Kevin?? I understood the bunker was done for us to say whats on our minds. And that is what I plan on doing until Batshit gets me booted. LOL And for the record I am only messing with you. :):)


  26. Oh, and good morning fellow Bunker Dwellers...

  27. Lol... No point was made.

    That was just the voices in my head messing with me again...

  28. Obviously I won't try to speak for my partner in crime here but as far as I can tell we're both pretty much on the same page.

    Personally I like to think of this blog as kind of a neighborhood bar and like any neighborhood bar the people sitting at the bar itself will probably all be discussing pretty the same thing. But the one's scattered around in the booths and table will be discussing all sorts of different things...

  29. And Sarge. Life doesn't come with an "edit button."

    Good grief, what do you think this is, some kind of "Safe Space" or something?



    And overcome...

  30. Well...except for Batshit. He'll try to impose his interpretations of what is "civil", try to take over everything, whine and cry...and run everyone off to kill the bar.

    That's just what he does.

  31. Kevin did I ever tell you can be a asshole when you want to be? :):)

  32. Lol... Yeah, I think you've mentioned it a time or two...

  33. Trust me, Batshit will be dealt with...

  34. Well sign me up for that game Kevin I will cut the cards.

  35. You deal me in on that game as well.
    But that's the only game I would play letting sarge cut or deal. I know enough already he'd stack the deck!
    Hahaha... Lmao
    Just messing with ya sarge... ;)

  36. You guys have fun but I think I'll head back up to the bar and see what's going on...

  37. It's obvious who's side the mainstream media (including Fox News) is on.

    George Soros funded, Al Sharpton and left wing, America hating groups have all gotten together to divide and tear this country apart and what's their response?

    Donald Trump is just so divisive.

    What a bunch of pathetic losers they are...

  38. Hammertime paybacks I can handle hehehe.

  39. Remember the whole Chris Christie Bridgegate scandal when the liberals and their media lapdogs almost lost their minds?

    I do.

    Now we have a bunch of leftist thugs (yes, I can actually use the word "thug" here) shutting down a Federally run and controlled Interstate highway, inconveniencing of people, possibly putting people in grave and possible life threatening situations (think Fire Trucks and Ambulances) in order to deny American citizens their constitutional right to participate the American Presidential process and what do we hear?

    They're just practicing their 1st amendment rights to free speech.

    What a load of bullshit...

  40. Then there was the pathetic and cowardly display when Martin O'Malley felt the need to apologize to the racist hate spewing group referred to a Black Lives Matter for having the nerve to say that "White Lives Matter Too."

    You'll never make it as a democrat by going off script and trying to escape the thought controlled plantation...

  41. Whats what I have been saying enforce the laws, they can not keep people from freedom of movement. it will get worst because nothing is enforced . Give the assholes a inch and they go after a mile. Joe should have arrested all of them and not just 3 and those cars should have been rammed over the side.

  42. Agreed Sarge.

    Personally I'd like to have seen ol' Joe coming in in one of those News helicopters with guns a blazing right over their heads then watching those delicate little flowers shit their pants.

    Maybe Lucy's right after all.

    Maybe I am an extremist...

  43. No you are like the other 60 or so percent that love this country, and we are tired of the idiots telling us how it is going to be, piss on it I am going to clean my guns right now. :):):) Be Prepared!!

  44. On CNN a Trump supporter pointed out the language used by Obama, you know like they bring a knife and we will bring a gun. In response an anti- Trump person said that is just talking points. Obama didn't mean any of it, they were just analogies.

    Rich the way they lie to protect Obama and try to discredit Trump.

  45. What's rich is the uninformed masses who believe their crap...

  46. Then there was the whole Gabby Giffords shooting where they blamed it all on a photo with her congressional district with a cross hairs target on Sara Palin's website.

    The loons went berzerk over that one...

  47. Let the George Soros funded and Obama backed terrorist organization burn Ferguson and Baltimore to the ground and what do we hear?

    Well, it's understandable.

    But let Trump use the word "riot" and all hell breaks lose...

  48. Speaking of riots isn't saying there will be riots if Trump is elected voter intimidation? Where is the outrage about it? Oh right it is okay for BLM to intimidate Trump voters.

  49. And let a couple of America hating thugs wipe their nasty asses with the American flag...

    And they're all cool with it.

    What a screwed up country we've allowed ourselves to become...

  50. None of the liberal pukes know a damn thing about world war 2, but their time is coming sooner than they think. What I don't like about their time coming is that them asshole are bringing it here with their arms wide open, frigging idiots.

  51. Well I remember reading that not many super powers last over a few hundred years. Is it our time? If it is I don't want to die from old age I at least would like to get a few shots off first taking out a few of the traitors/Liberal commies sons of bitches. Now is that asking to much?

  52. Careful Sarge. Keep it up and Lucy will call you names and Batshit will screaming for his version of civility...

  53. Trust me when I say you'll appreciate Hammer's contribution to the summit...

  54. Well just between you and me both those pricks needs to be in my sites first. Damn sure wouldn't be any lost. Hey Batshit copy and paste in your files you punk asshole.

  55. Monica Lewinsky turns 50 this year.

    How fast they grow up. Seems like just yesterday she was crawling around the Oval Office on her hands and knees putting everything in her mouth...

  56. Just heard a story about the California Highway Patrol pulling over a trucker with all sorts of blood and guts splattered all over the front of his truck.

    Yes sir. I did drive all the way through Arizona.

    No sir. I didn't see any protesters...

    1. Makes sense since there wasn't any mention of brains splattered on the front of the truck m

  57. General Info the Race is about to start ch 6. Now quit bothering me. :)

  58. Well, I got the final reply to my question. I was given a two week "sabbatical" from the urinal for a post where I reminded Lucy (bless her heart) that she once flagged me for giving her the nickname NLL (nearly lucid lucy) And I didn't spell it out or use the initials I just typed ***, but that was considered a personal attack the type of which I had been warned about. Funny thing is I still never got the email for the post being pulled, it was simply gone.

  59. There are very protective of Lucy but that is over the top. Really how does one consider that a personal attack?

    I got in trouble for calling Lucy a liar after she lied on her blog. It was a lie and I proved it to be one, but I still got in trouble.

    It is the favoritism and hypocrisy of the mods that makes me happy to be blogging and posting here. No need to worry about every little thing you post. And guess what? It has been very civil here.

  60. Well Ray, just should have said she is a worthless piece of shit, but than you would have become a full time member of the bunker. She isn't any better than Batshit. But as you well know you and I have just a different vocabulary.

  61. I agree KTT. What got me my first trip to "boot hill" in 2013 was a post where I publicly called the mods on their hypocrisy over who was dying that day. I called them all a bunch of liberal hypocrites in a post.

  62. I don't suppose they said who made the initial decision to pull the trigger, did they?

  63. And speaking of Lucy. I couldn't help but laugh when she recently called me an extremist after claiming she hadn't read a single thing I've written in several years.

    Of course there was no name calling nor was it a personal attack.


    1. Lucy gets a pass for some reason. Notice she hasn't blogged for a while. Thought she might try to fill the void over there.

  64. Anybody see where the University of Kansas professor was allowed to stay on staff for using the word nigger in class. Turns out that they viewed it as a classroom example, and those that complained werent even there.
    So A. You can't use examples of racism to demonstrate a point.
    B. You can be offended even though you weren't present or even know what the fuck is going on.
    C. You are still allowed to put a swastika on a Trump poster.
    D. Professor still subject to re-education and cultural training
    E. The jimmys still get rustled
    F. Hammertime still doesn't give a shit.

    BTW, if sherrif joe would of rammed the vehicles with an Abrams tank, I would of looked the other way and asked "what's the big deal?". It is the freeway afterall....

    1. Afterall, sherrif Joe dindu nuffin....

    2. Hammertime don't know if you know then entire story. She is a communications professor who was asked by a student how to communicate with minorities. She said something like, I don't know because I haven't had the life experiences minorities have had, I've never seen the word nigger written on the wall.

      She was being humble and didn't say the n word, but used the actual word so they tried to get her fired. Truth is they were gunning for her before this. They just saw an opportunity and took it.

    3. Funny third no thing is the president says it and all think it is great.

    4. Thanks, didn't know the actual content of its use. But she will understand after a re-education. She should of grown up on the east side. Some of us can demonstrate a high degree in Highland Park Kung Fu. Communicating to minorities is no different than talking between you and me. But they get an excuse for being poor and in the hood, and I got out because of my privilege and ability to bust my ass and see it through. That's why they are still there. It seems skin color doesn't generate privilege in my eyes, only an excuse to remain in poverty. And my beliefs are backed up with life lessons, not some liberal rhetoric.
      But I can see how a stupid white woman could get herself in trouble at a University with some naiveté. And I'm glad for her that the intent was deemed non-threatening.

  65. Well I would like to really help you all out, but at my age I don't pass out my advice just to anyone.

  66. O.P here.
    Hey all! Been reading off and on...! Might have some thoughts on different things along the way. Been one of those will hope to have more time later. Hope you all are having a great weekend!

  67. Okay, I will give you all a break I have to start taxes, for 3 people, could take days or a heart attack what ever comes first. Stay well.

  68. CJ is a ghost town. Nothing going on at all. Serves them right.

    I will not make the summit, going to be out of town. An unavoidable conflict. I hope Hammer is bringing what I think he is bringing. I want to see some video.

  69. He is indeed bringing what you think he's bringing, PHenry and I'm sure video can be provided.

    And hopefully that unavoidable conflict of yours can be avoided by then...

  70. Oh,and good morning all you shitheads.

  71. Good morning. Nunya here.

    Well, looks like ol' Illucid Lucy is, yet again, regurgitating her "Trickle Up Poverty"...ooops..I mean "Trickle Down Economics" idiocy over there.Yes, complete with her heart-wrenching Gumpian anectodes of her personal struggles WAAAAYYY back when...y' bore the reader to tears.

    She's just done everything, been everywhere.

    Here's a song dedicated to ol' Ms. LSD:

    I see Buttstache is over there "celebrating" kissing ass, too.
    And, it's been so nice to have all the wonderful, informative community blogs over there lately, says he! YEA! Nothin' but high-volume 'click-generators' over there, huh?! Why...a (very) few of them even break a whole baker's dozen!

    Too funny.

    Maybe they should move to Cuba, where the system is more to their liking? I see Obama went down to mingle with like-minded commies, and lick Castro's boots! Obama looks around at the misery, poverty, oppression and total lack of freedom and thinks to himself "Now...THAT'S what I'm talkin' about!"

    Yessiree...a perfect example of Trickle Up Poverty, right there. Lucy in the Sky and Buttmunch Batshit are all for it!

    "Celebrate" THIS from good ol' Hank, Sr., Buttstache:

  72. Looks like Batshit and Lucy are playing 88"s over on cj.

  73. I love how now all the ungodly left wingers talk about this imaginary "trickle down economics". Now ill-lucid is writing blogs about it, Alan is chiming in as the OG of trickle down haters and even buttstache is trying make some relevant comment if you get past all the butt licking and sucking and slurping.

    Their idea of how an economy is supposed to function is there are hard workers like us, who work, take chances, invest and earn money. Then the government comes and takes our money from us and hands it over to the lazy, shiftless, greedy democrat voting left wing miscreants. Hence trickle down. We earn it, and it trickled down to the ones who don't.

    Instead what supply side did was create jobs. Millions of jobs. 35 million jobs. All the way through pantsless Billy Clinton's terms. But that's not viewed as success by the ungodly left. They don't want jobs, they just want money. So it must be a failure if all it did was give people the chance to earn a dignified living working instead of sucking at the government feed trough.

    So il-lucid and Alan have a far different view of why supply side worked or failed. I say jobs should always be the end goal. And if letting the job producers keep more of the money they earned and create a job creating friendly economy causes job creation, then that's a winner. They say it's cruel and unusual punishment to expect people to work and earn their own money when there's so many people out there who they can just take money from and give it to their voting base.

    These people have been so indoctrinated in Marx and Engels they actually believe this crap they say. Sad but true.

    And now they want to elect an outright Socialist, who is actually an old Soviet commie hiding behind the Socialist label. That's how far down into hell we have descended. We don't have far to go till we're waiting in bread lines and getting sent to gulags for speaking like this.

  74. What the hell happen CJ take over the blog?, Good Grief!!

  75. We've all been waiting for you to get things rolling...

  76. And while I was waiting I went ahead and posted a new blog.

    It's up and running...