Saturday, August 6, 2016

Clinton Cash...

Quote of the day:

"Pass the Popcorn"  Anonymous poster  8/5/16

Speaking of popcorn.

If you guys can spare an hour and four minute this weekend I highly recommend watching today's video.

"Clinton Cash."

It answers all your questions.

It names names.

And erases any and all doubt you might have had about whether or not Bill and Hillary Clinton are among the most despicable people you've ever encountered in your lifetime.

Pass the popcorn indeed...

        

Kevin McGinty

111 comments:

  1. I got four hours to spare but not in one sitting for awhile at least, but won't belong now, all systems coming up to full power.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This video flies in the face of everything the Democrats portray the Clintons to be.
    They will rape and pillage the planet all in the name of dollars.
    Kevin is correct. It names names, and connects the dots. It is irrefutable proof of how dastardly and dangerous these people are.
    It's true they have already screwed the United States out of money, resources, etc... But imagine what Bill's fee for speeches will skyrocket too, and how many underhanded deals will take place if she is POTUS.
    Videos like this and "Hillary's America" need to become our narrative. America needs to wrap it's head around this information.
    This is where Trump needs to dominate. At the debates, I would like to see him answer questions thoughtfully, and then carefully lead to information regarding the Clinton past. And do it nicely, and with a smile. She will meltdown when cornered. Corner that bitch, and let her own actions and responses cook her. It can be done, if Trump strategically catches her off guard while at the same time responding in a way that shows his intent as POTUS. Don't make it an outright attack.
    Be the mongoose, who let's the snakes own actions seal their fate.
    Just my two cents......

    ReplyDelete
  3. Just to add....
    The Clintons support international human right violators, rapists, jihadis, oil tycoons, huge mining Ventures, rain forest destruction, and use international disasters as money making machines.
    None of the financial gains makes it to the local people. The tyrants they assist transfer the money out of the country, effectively raping the local people.
    It befuddles me as to how idiots like Alan Looney support her, and yet barf on and on about Koch brothers trickle down bologna ad nauseum.
    The Koch Bros could apply for sainthood compared to the Clintons.
    Bottom line.
    Screw the Clintons, and let them burn in the everlasting fires of hell like they deserve.

    And there you have it, two rants by hammer for the day.
    Now I will bid you adieu....

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am glad no one would expect me to be able to compete with that young man. Sure is nice having him hanging around, Hell he says more good stuff in two comments than I can muster up all day. Later Hammer take care.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The DNC is severely corrupt....it ain't just the Clintons though they're the snake's head of the operation.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The DNC is pure evil.

    ReplyDelete
  7. SSAH, go back on CJ, then you will automatically be IWNGU, now that is scary isn't it. But you have competition according to some guy AL Arms there will be 8 or9 of him. Good grief the left is brain dead.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 3 of 3...
    Roger Ramjet

    27 - Kevin Ives and Don Henry - Known as "The boys on the track" case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the two boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.

    THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:

    28 - Keith Coney - Died when his motorcycle apparently slammed into the back of a truck, July 1988. No one saw the accident and the bike was not damaged.

    29 - Keith McMaskle - Died stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988

    30 - Gregory Collins - Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.

    31 - Jeff Rhodes - He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.

    33 - James Milan - Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to "natural causes."

    34 - Jordan Kettleson - Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.

    35 - Richard Winters - A suspect in the Ives / Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.

    THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD:

    36 - Major William S. Barkley Jr.

    37 - Captain Scott J. Reynolds

    38 - Sgt. Brian Hanley

    39 - Sgt. Tim Sabel

    40 - Major General William Robertson

    41 - Col. William Densberger

    42 - Col. Robert Kelly

    43 - Spec. Gary Rhodes

    44 - Steve Willis

    45 - Robert Williams

    46 - Conway LeBleu

    47 - Todd McKeehan

    All had said to friends that they had seen too much.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I compete with no one. I just stand with a good group of people that see the same things I do. Only thing different is my set of eyes that are just a little younger and hungrier for change to the way things should be. That's all.


    I'm busy today, buy I thought I would add that I ranted on cj directed at that crazy Alan Looney. People may tire of my rants, but sometimes enough is enough. I took a stand and it spilled over. The SOB didn't even watch the video, and you can tell by his comment.

    Gotta go guys, keep repelling the hordes....
    Got your back as always.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Oh that young guy is so modest. But he did a damn good job on Lunn, that is worth plenty of attaboys.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hammer I never get tired of your rants. You keep it up brother. We need all the firepower we can direct at these assholes

    I say unlimbers that 20 pound Parrot Rifle and fire at will.

    ReplyDelete
  12. That Lunn guy recycles the same old moronic talking points. Sad part is he thinks he is brilliant.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ol' Alan is a good example of the danger of too many potato chips. He and his blogger love Lucyfur are known as "Chips and Dip"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Speaking of Looney Lucy she has been quiet lately. Maybe even she can't defend Hillary.

      Delete
  14. I think she is just busy organizing those after school satanic clubs she and her kind are trying to get started.

    ReplyDelete
  15. http://theamericanmirror.com/shock-photo-grandma-hillary-helped-stairs/

    This photo is going to do damage. I guarantee more will follow in the coming months. Her seizures, double vision, and just frailness in general will do irreversible damage to younger voters. This is not the leader of the free world.

    As a note, I have two members of my family who have a hard time getting around. I am not poking fun at anyone who has any disability. It's not funny. My point is that today's day in age you can't just crop photos and use creative camera angles as in the days of FDR. Won't happen.

    But, there is always the potential that she just came home from a bender. Either way, social media will eat this up. The twitter comments are already pretty rough. Funny too, you might say.

    Catch ya on the flip folks....

    ReplyDelete
  16. I hope you are correct, Hammertime, but I still meet youngsters - that are voters - here in Topeka that never knew that Obama's mother was a white girl from Kansas. There are no witnesses of Chalky ever teaching law school or even being in law school... The media will hide Hillary's illnesses from the general public just like everything else.

    My elevator pitch to them is the email server, and that she sold America down the river for donations to the Clinton Foundation. The uranium story describes it perfectly. That seems to stick with the people I talk with. The spy recently executed by Iran that was outed by Hillary's email server leak is just another example.

    Roger Ramjet

    ReplyDelete
  17. Here's something odd:

    http://cjonline.com/news/2016-08-07/universities-boost-stipends-ahead-ruling-grad-unions

    Now...how the HELL do you "unionize" freakin' college students?! With the "United Auto Workers", no less?!!! They are not employees, in the first place! They sure ain't no "auto workers"!

    The heads of these schools are flat-out against it. Really?

    Why?

    It's just those 'chickens coming home to roost'! The Marxist-run colleges drilled that entitlement, socialst crap into their brainwashed little heads...and are surprised when it's coming back to bite them?

    No matter...according to the anti-American socialist-leftists, when doddering, drunken,lying, cheating, crooked-Hillary gets elected and has to have chair-lifts installed all over the White House, college will be free to one and all. ALL. Except...maybe...some..if y'know what I mean? The rest of you...go the mines to support all this free shit!

    Freakin' unbelievable. Time for more sidewalk chalk.........punks.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Too funny...

    From one of the most uninteresting, passed-over, low-traffic bloggers on the Urinal....a blog about how to attract website visitors!

    http://cjonline.com/blog-post/twyher/2016-08-05/have-website-here-how-attract-visitors

    (No need to actually GO there. Move along...nuthin' to see...)

    ReplyDelete
  19. Saw that one.

    Thought about pointing out the irony of a blog no one reads giving advice on how to attract potential customers.

    But even I'm not that big of an asshole...

    ReplyDelete
  20. Oh, I never lie.

    I might "shot circuit" every once in a while.

    And the way I heard it, that's perfectly acceptable...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Damn good thing you didn't say that on CJ, "Shot circuit" Christ they would be say you are me!!! Can't have that. Good Grief. IWNGU

      Delete
  21. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    2. My values are fully intact and require no consideration.

      However the same can't be said of the traitors trying to throw the election in favor of Hillary Clinton...

      Delete
  22. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tom Ridge never missed an opportunity to steal our liberty in the name of security.

      Republican but not conservative.

      Delete
  23. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Former national security Council people. And their policies have been garbage. Global elitists.
    America is being made great again.
    And America will be first.
    All fifty of these individuals can suck it, and watch it all happen.

    So Yea, the letter really is nothing much.
    But I bet their reaction will be something come November.....

    President Trump 2016


    ReplyDelete
  25. Sorry, I had to open a window. Somebody farted really bad and it was stinking the joint up.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Every single one of those people along with Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary the Bitch Clinton are directly responsible for the mess the world is in today.

    Just more of the "Never Trump" bullshit...

    ReplyDelete
  27. And those Never Trump people can kiss my ass.

    If Hillary does end up winning this thing we'll have them to thank for what happens when she completely blows up the Supreme Court.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Why do those on the list feel the need to come out against Trump? Because she threatens to upset their apple cart. They don't hate Iran, they love Iran because without Iran they have no purpose no reason to peddle their arms and make the business of war profitable.

    ReplyDelete
  29. I just checked the Terms of Service and there it was.

    Rule #1 Calling the mods pussies is frowned upon.

    Sorry man. But rules are rules.

    I'm sure you understand...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And what rule did the anonymous poster violate other than posting stupid liberal stuff? It was fun reading their stupid shit and responding.

      sure I understand you have a little kingdom where you make the rules. You're rhe big man here among your minions. I had a different impression of you from CJ where you stood up to the assholes and put them in their place instead of jus deleting posts that challenge you. Yeah I understand now.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
    3. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    4. Deleted out of respect of the ladies that come around here and post.
      Probably best to just be above the fray....

      FNG anyway.....

      Delete
  30. Now to address your question.

    I can't speak to their individual reasons but for whatever reason they all have skin in the game.

    They all represent the old guard GOP that's desperately trying to hold onto power.

    ReplyDelete
  31. The old guard GOP and the DNC are one in the same.

    They both want open borders.

    They both support globalization which is destroying our jobs here at home.

    They both support amnesty.

    They both believe allowing trns of thousands of Syrian refugees is a swell idea.

    I've never said revolutions were pretty.

    But sometimes they're necessary...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well put Kevin. Establishment GOP and current liberals are the enemy.

      America first.
      Screw globalism.

      Delete
  32. If somebody starts throwin the
    vajay-jay term around in here, somebody gonna start actin like Neegan up in this mofo...

    Lol

    ReplyDelete
  33. Actually Marsh, you just think you understand.

    Truth is you're grasping at straws and drawing conclusions concerning things you know nothing about.

    There are two mods here.

    And we never question each other's judgment.

    I didn't see the comments that were removed earlier and had nothing to do with them being deleted but if my partner said they gotta go they gotta go.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So help my understand why anonymous's post were deleted when they simply listed the names of political hacks that signed an anti- trump letter? He didn't call anyone a pussy or attack one of your friends.

      Is the rule that everyone has to agree with everyone here? Disagree and get ginned here too?

      As much crap as you give BS for running to the mods to get offensive posts pulled I never thought you'd do the same thing. Disappointing.

      Delete
  34. There yo go again, Marsh.

    Speaking of things you know nothing about.

    Your best bet would be to not mess with my friend, Hammertime.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here is what I know. On CJ you blog without fear and put the libs in their place. Here you just delete those posts. am I wrong?

      Delete
    2. You're almost absolutely right. The only correction is that the posts deleted don't have to be liberal or from liberals; they can be suspected of being eventually liberal or from suspected liberals.

      Delete
  35. Feel free to delete my posts. I said what I wanted Appreciate your invite to come to your blog. But not my cup of tea.

    ReplyDelete
  36. I like you Marsh.

    Really I do.

    But if we're ever going to be able to have any kind of meaningful discussion you're going to have to learn to listen.

    I've already told you I had nothing to do with deleting the posts you're so wound up about so you can knock it off with the whole, "Here you just delete those posts" nonsense.

    And like I said.

    I like you Marsh.

    Really I do.

    You're new here otherwise I wouldn't bother explaining this to you.

    We have a very long history with our anonymous friend.

    His posts always start very liberal and very reasonable. (probably like the one's you're so upset about)

    As the conversation progresses his comments become more and more vicious to the point of sadistic.

    Seriously.

    We're always suspicious of anyone who won't identify themselves.

    I don't know but I'd guess that's pretty much what led to the comments being deleted...



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  37. And for the record.

    There are no leaders nor are there any minions.

    We all know each other personally and for the most part an attack on one of us is an attack on us all.

    You're welcome to stick around for as long as you like.

    But know this.

    Over at that other website I have no choice but to accept their double standards.

    I have no such restrictions here...

    ReplyDelete
  38. Hey Marsh I am not so polite as most out here, so I say Fuck you asshole. Now even you can understand that. No hard feelings.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Of course no hard feelings. I just considered the source and moved on.

      Delete
  39. Marsh. You're new here. You wanna stay here? If so, you have to obey the only rule: no dissent allowed. That includes saying things that suggest there's any dissent because dissent is, as you can see it characterized, above, an "attack on one of us."

    McGinty's being honest when he says there's no double standard here. There's only the one way and no tolerance for anything else--even suspected dissent is grounds for deletion.

    Welcome to the club.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What is disappointing is I agreed with T them when they pointed out that Gin protects his buddy and deletes posts that bat finds offensive and then they so the same thing here. Post telling me to go fuck off stays but a post that helps Hammertime understand what a minion is gets deleted. Doesn't matter to me that someone tells me to fuck off I can take it. And it doesn't really matter that the mods protect their friends but they need to realize they are the same as CJ and that is disappointing.

      Delete
  40. The most important rule is to not comment unless you're willing to identify yourself.

    Your anonymous comment will be allowed only because it helps make my point...

    ReplyDelete
  41. Boy...the Urinal Pravda brought in a freighter full of bait to chum the waters today! And, the sharks are in a feeding frenzy!

    Urinal far-left-biased hitpiece on Jenkins: Check.

    http://cjonline.com/news/2016-08-08/rep-lynn-jenkins-wont-talk-trump-after-opponent-britani-potter-presses

    (Apparently Potter-mouth doesn't know enough about issues to stick to issues, instead of stupid-ass questions of why someone supports someone?)

    Oh...another one: Yet another Urinal far-left-biased hitpiece on Brownback:

    http://cjonline.com/news/2016-08-08/brownback-says-election-not-repudiation-policies-doesnt-know-how-state-would-pay-new

    Quote "Boosting state education funding by the $500 million to $800 million some expect the Kansas Supreme Court to call for..." and denying that spending has ALREADY been actually increasing...and still crying about "underfunding"...or the false "reducing school funding"?

    Nice job lying and brainwashing the ignorant masses, Urinal. Marx would be proud!

    then, there's this "Assoicated press" (THEIR spelling...y'know...the 'professionals'? Not mine.)

    http://cjonline.com/news/2016-08-08/ap-fact-check-donald-trump-shapes-facts-fit-economic-agenda

    "By Josh Boak and Christopher S. Rugaber
    The Assoicated Press"

    "EDITOR’S NOTE — A look at the veracity of claims by political figures"

    (More correctly...a look at trying to blast Trump's responses to Hillary's ignorant nonsense).

    "TRUMP: “She said she wanted to raise taxes on the middle class.”

    "THE FACTS: If Clinton said that — and it’s debatable — it’s clear she didn’t mean to."

    Yeah...she just probably "short-circuited"....again.

    "TRUMP on the unemployment rate: “This 5 percent figure is one of the biggest hoaxes in modern American politics.”

    "THE FACTS: The unemployment rate has its shortcomings but it is not a hoax."

    No...it's "shortcomings" are that it's a lie...and a hoax!

    "TRUMP: Repealing and replacing Obama’s health care law would mean “saving another 2 million American jobs.”

    Now, then...check out THIS answer!!!

    "The agency explained that the main impact of subsidized coverage under the law is on the supply of labor. Translation: It gives many people the opportunity to retire, stay at home with family or switch to part-time work, because they can get health insurance more easily outside of their jobs."

    "That voluntary retreat from the workforce, made possible by the law’s benefits, is not the same as employers slashing jobs because of the law’s costs."

    Apparently, it's much better for millions to stay at home and not particpate in the workforce, and get government healthcare (but not work to contribute to taxes)and...OBVIOUSLY other government welfare...just because of the difference in health care coverage. As if that's a GOOD thing?! "Why...if I get a job...I may have to contribute some of my pay to MY OWN health coverage!" No self-respecting gimme-gimme liberal would tolerate THAT kind on unfairness!!!!

    Nice job Urinal Pravda. And...look at the comments over there...the brainwashed looney-leftists are going absolutely BATSHIT CRAZY!!!!!



    ReplyDelete
  42. Well, since I'm the one that deleted the posts I'll tell you why.

    Marsh, you are welcome here or welcome to leave. But don't assume you know what's what based on being around here a few days.

    What's different about us and the CJ Urinal? Well, they claim to be open and fair and seeking dialog and conversations and blah blah blah. All a bunch of bullshit. I got booted off there because I referred to the left as the unholy left. No warning, no nothing. Just gone. And it was because batshit didn't like it. They ban phrases. You can get booted for using the phrase anchor baby. Or thug.

    They delete posts for being off topic on open blog Friday when there specifically is no topic. They make up rules as they go.

    I've seen friends booted off like me over and over.

    So what's the difference? We make no such claim. We're not fair and balanced. We're assholes when we want to be. You come on here to with the intent of offending us? You might just get deleted. Do we cut our friends more slack than we do trolls? Hell yes we do.

    And an attack on my friends is an attack on me. Simple as that.

    See, I have no tolerance for trolls. Our anony-mouth friend here has been hanging around for a while now. We know who he his. He's a full fledged no question about it troll. And we don't feed the trolls here. Trolls are welcome on CJ. They are encouraged. We were all warned about flagging batshit for trolling. But not here.

    And this particular troll has a long history with us. He was booted off CJ because even the other trolls didn't want him there. He has a history of harassing people in their personal lives. People who choose to identify themselves here have has their employers contacted. One person actually got in legal issues and cost him money thanks to this asshole.

    So don't go thinking you know the story. You don't. That troll is never welcome here. Never. If a liberal want's to come here, identify himself with a user name like the rest of us and participate, that's fine. But trolls will find no home here.

    And like Kevin said. This particular guy is predictable. He starts with what sounds like reasonable posts, then they steadily devolve into nasty foul all out trolling. So I choose to nip it in the bud.

    Here's the deal. The guy's an asshole. And the only assholes we tolerate are the ones we like. This is our blog. We'll do whatever we damn well want. And we won't pretend otherwise.

    CJ pretends to be fair and open but they are not. They are a bunch of liberals who allow liberals to do what they want and punish conservatives. The difference is we're not pretending to do anything.

    Don't get confused with what happens on CJ and what happens here. People only try to get CJ to actually hold to the standards they claim to have. Here, we do whatever the hell we want. And you are welcome to participate or not. But don't expect anything to change around here unless Kevin decides to change it.

    Is that a good enough explanation? Cause that's all you get from me.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Damn good explanation. It is your way or the highway, no dissent and you're an asshole and proud of it.

    Bitter because CJ deleted you.

    I can take it or leave it

    Thanks for the explanation. Clears things up nicely.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Man you don't pay very close attention, do you? Did you read what I said or not?

    Did you read about the history we have with this guy?

    I'm thinking you came here looking to pick a fight and you won't be happy without one.

    And if you thing we don't have dissent around here and don't disagree with each other you really don't pay attention.

    I'm glad that cleared things up for you. Always happy to help.

    ReplyDelete
  45. So here's something new. This was posted on CJ by tearsandchalk and it was so good I stole it. Here goes....

    Remember when the KKK guy endorsed Trump? Trump didn't ask him to or have anything to do with it, it was an unsolicited endorsement from an unwelcome source. And the left had a field day with it. "Proves he's a racist" they cried. "Even the KKK is endorsing Trump" they hollered. And a hundred other references trying to insinuate there was some logical connection to be made.

    Well, hillary spoke at a rally in Orlando and guess who was sitting right behind her in full view of the camera? Seddique Mateen, the father of the Orlando shooter. When asked he said he was supporting hillary. He had a homemade sign. Big fan, apparently. You know him, the guy who said Allah is punishing gays.

    So will this show up splashed all over the democrat party controlled media? That's a rhetorical question, because of course it won't.

    Does this mean hillary agrees with the individual that Allah is punishing gays? I'll let you be the judge. Just be sure and apply the same standards you did when the KKK nut endorsed Trump now, OK?

    ReplyDelete
  46. Off topic, but I'm going to share anyway (smiles). Some stuff that batty does makes me shake my head and some stuff totally pisses me off and then there's stuff that just quacks me up.... take this exchange for example:

    Battlestache 08/09/16 - 08:39 am

    As long as the republican nominee for President...
    ...is an orange four-time bankrupt gameshow host, I'm going to keep calling the republican nominee for President of the United States of America an orange four-time bankrupt gameshow host.
    Don't like it that I call the republican nominee for President of the United States of America an orange four-time bankrupt gameshow host?
    Then don't nominate an orange four-time bankrupt gameshow host to be your candidate for President of the United States of America!

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Batty is stuck on repeat mode there.....
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~

    and to that I didn't get pissed off... nope... gave batty a wake up call instead...

    Battlestache
    your likes or dislikes truly won't sway me at the polls come November - you don't carry the clout nor the weight for such influence.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    batty hasn't replied with any quick wit smart a** comeback yet... and it's been about 30 minutes now...


    to that I have to say 'wow'.

    (giggles).


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I still think he is that Twhyler guy.

      Noticed when I pointed out the use of bold he stopped.

      Look at that smug picture on the blog. Boring and stupid just like bat.

      Delete
  47. SSAH, the way I see it anyone that comes here and is anonymous, and even begins to smell like HandJob is getting both barrels from me , I don't owe any dick heads any respect. It isn't what people say that is the problem in most cases it is how they say it.

    ReplyDelete
  48. with a typical reply..... battle posted on the other site...

    that's ok -

    it took him a while to come back with that...

    ReplyDelete
  49. Marsh, we know who this guy is. We've been dealing with him for a long time. And like Sarge says, if you come around here anonymously then you are pretty suspicious. That's why we encourage people to get a google account and a login. Because handjob went through a period where he was posting claiming to be people who post anonymously but tell us who they are.

    Sorry, but trolls are not welcome here. And never will be. They can go over on CJ and do their trolling. They don't seem to care one bit.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Sarge,

    Sent you and Ghost an email.


    Hugs~ Rikki

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

      Delete
  51. Rikki got it thanks I will answer it in the morning if okay, got a few others to answer also, You just keep kicking batshits ass, Hear Me!!

    ReplyDelete
  52. You got it Sarge :)

    ReplyDelete
  53. I would normally put up a new blog about now but this one still seems to be firing so I'm going to hold off.

    This has been an interesting one and I hope more people watch the video.

    ReplyDelete
  54. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  55. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  56. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  57. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  58. LOL Ha Ha He He you sure would think that troll would get tired of posting and then he has it go POOF into space. Guess he has nothing better to do than make a fool out of himself.

    ReplyDelete
  59. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  60. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  61. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  62. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  63. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are clearly unhinged if you believe Trump made a threat against Clinton. You and your ilk is what is wrong with politics today b

      You lie and gullible people believe it.

      Just think of all the false narratives that one could spew based on some of the comments Obama made if they were of your ilk.

      Bring a knife and we will bring a gun......oh my Obama is threatening violence against people.

      I sense fear and desperation in your part otherwise why would you stoop so low in fabricating a false story.

      Delete
    2. All those deleted posts were excerpts from the New York Times and the Washington Post. I didn't write them. Others, with better word skills and subsequent to professional editorial review wrote them. That ilk--since you like the term so much you used it twice.

      I'm curious, though, since you believe yourself to be such a clear-headed, fully-informed, objective observer of human behavior, tell me: (1) what do you think the standard ought to be to judge whether a threat to do physical harm/breach of the peace is actual or imagined? The effect the utterance has on the average person or the speaker's subsequently stating that he was "only kidding?"

      Then, (2) Back in May, the boys here held their "Summit" at Truckhenge, complete with liquor, firearms and their usual rhetoric. If I'd gone to the event, been "outed" as a suspected liberal and one of your vocal ringleaders had said, "I hope we don't have to use Second Amendment measures to straighten out your thought processes," would I have been a hypersensitive sissy to have felt apprehensive about my physical well being while being able to eye those itchy trigger fingers loosened by hootch?

      Finally, there's no false story here. Trump said what he said. It's on tape, in print and readily available verbatim.

      This post won't last long because it violates The Only Rule Here: no dissent. Read fast, think thoroughly and post your rejoinder, if you like, knowing that yours won't last any longer than mine.

      Delete
  64. Skippey, you suppose he spends a lot of time typing that gibberish? Hope so. Cause it takes nothing to delete him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Damn now I look like I was talking to myself.

      And to think I came back to share some exciting news.

      There is a new exciting blog up at CJ that you won't want to miss. The Ins and Outs of Inline Faxing.

      Kevin has some real competition now.

      Delete
  65. Marsh, it happens all the time. Save your breath with this troll. He won't listen anyway.

    Old adage, never wrestle with a pig in the mud. You won't win, and the pig will enjoy it.

    Or...

    Never get in a pissing match with a skunk.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Marsh trust me Kevin welcomes all new bloggers that post a blog, we all do, so have at it if they are good the better for us all, it is called spread the wealth, but if it is one of those typical lib blogs it won't last.

    ReplyDelete
  67. LOL Good job Yhea the libs are in full attack mode.They are just holding their breath waiting for any thing they think they can spin into some kind of a spin lie that will kill him. Oh you can bet they are talking about how to get rid of him. They are just being more careful now that they have been put out to dry. Those low life's will do and say any thing to get their queen bitch and her agenda in power. I just wonder how they can even sleep . God only knows what their fate will be. It would be fun to be able to see them burn.

    ReplyDelete
  68. This is something funny:

    Once again they needed a distration and needed it quick.

    Unfortunately Trump handed it to them.

    At a rally of his own Trump was talking about the consequences of electing Hillary Clinton. He mentioned what could happen to the 2nd amendment if she's allowed to appoint the next Supreme Court Justice.

    He went on to say something like, if that happens there nothing you can do about it. Well, the 2nd amendment people might be able to do something about it.

    It was clearly meant as a joke.

    A stupid joke, yes.

    It doesn't matter though.

    The distraction they desperately needed is securely in place.
    *****************************************
    No, not the way he spelled "distraction." The part where he says, "He went on to say something like, if that happens there nothing you can do about it. Well, the 2nd amendment people might be able to do something about it."

    "Something like?" You can't just go copy and paste precisely what he did say? Even when you say "something like," you miss the obvious problem: "if that happens."

    "If that happens," for you guys not used to living in anything but some imagined past that never was, is what people say when they're talking about something that "hasn't yet happened." The future. You know, tomorrow or the day after? The "that" in "if that happens" is "the Evil Hillary Clinton nominating Supreme Court justices." Are you with me so far?

    So, the guys says, "if that happens" (concentrate and see if you can see in your minds him saying, "If the Evil Hillary Clinton appoints Supreme Court justices") "there's nothing you can do about it." Now, stop right there for a second and let's recap.

    For the "if that happens" to come to pass, that is for "the Evil Hillary Clinton to appoint Supreme Court justices," she would have to be the winner of the Presidential election. You can see that, right? Nobody but the President of the United States can appoint Supreme Court justices. You understand that, don't you? So, if we're all on the same page of the hymnal here, the guy who said that is talking about some time in the future after the election's over and Hillary's won.

    He can't be talking about any time in the future before the election since "the Evil Hillary Clinton" can't appoint Supreme Court justices unless the election's over and she's won.

    Now, this last part is really easy so relax and just read for enjoyment.

    Since there can be no disagreement that he's talking about what President Hillary Clinton would do, when he says "Well, the 2nd amendment people might be able to do something about it," he cannot be heard to mean that those "2nd amendment people" need to get out and vote as a group and prevent, with their votes, Hillary Clinton's election.

    There can be no mistaking that he named a specific group (2nd amendment people) to respond to a specific future event (Clinton's being elected) and picked the specific group (2nd amendment people) because the members of that group have firearms.

    I don't see how you all are not completely insulted by his having said that about you. Why have you not gotten instantly to your feet to denounce loudly and clearly even the slightest suggestion that because you're "2nd amendment people" you're also traitors ready to participate in armed rebellion?

    He's lumped you together as the worst of the worst and all you can do is defend his doing that and trying to explain it away? Is it not clear how he thinks of you? As a group of nothing but bloodthirsty traitors willing to cast aside all rules of law when an election doesn't go your way?

    ReplyDelete
  69. Boo Hoo we are all broken up asshole. You feel better now?

    ReplyDelete
  70. Anonymous, I'm not going to bother responding to the multiple false (and patently stupid) points you tried your best to make.

    However I would like to point out how easily the uninformed masses such as yourself are manipulated by the godless, American, left-wing media.

    A corrupt media and a population so completely unaware of what's going on in the world is exactly what's wrong with this country today.

    Thanks for proving my point...

    ReplyDelete
  71. Kevin it is a good thing that assholes mother was pro life, because if she knew what she put out here he wouldn't have had prayer.

    ReplyDelete
  72. I guess sometimes you just leave something that stupid up there for the world to see. I've been deleting everything he posts just because it looks like he spends a lot of time to type so I delete just so he wasted a bunch of time.

    I hate trolls. They represent everything wrong with the internet. And that's all this guy is ba troll. And a particularly evil one.

    Oh, and an asshole too of course.

    ReplyDelete
  73. 19 shot and 9 killed in Chicago on Monday. One of the deadliest ever, and the most deadly in ten years or so.
    Again nothing mentioned in the media about misbehaving dindu thugs.
    Maybe it was a tribute to Michael Brown's two year sobriety celebration. You know, like the kebabs in the middle east shooting in the air? Instead gangsters hold'em sideways and horizontal. Who knows....

    Just the perspective of a minion.
    That's how I roll.

    Later folks. I'll try and check in by Friday. Keep pushing back on the hordes.

    ReplyDelete
  74. Keep pushing back on the hordes indeed.

    It reminds me a lot of the Walking Dead.

    We keep pushing them back and they just keep coming.

    And coming.

    And coming...

    ReplyDelete
  75. But there is good news.

    Obviously once we all went back and salvaged what was left of the community blogs over at that other website things around here have dropped off.

    That was pretty much expected.

    The comment counts have been down but it seems to be turning around a little.

    And the total page views is gaining strength again.

    So far this particular blog has generated 429 hits.

    Now I wonder why so many left-wing loons are worried about what we say and do here in this little Underground Bunker of ours...

    ReplyDelete
  76. this will get them lefties fired up.... (snicker snicker)


    revelation...



    (snicker snicker)

    All Hillary supporters whine like mules.....

    (enter hearty laughter)

    psst...psst... pass it on.

    (smiles)


    and this is also on your blog at the other site....

    ReplyDelete
  77. http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/new-audio-ted-strickland-jokes-that-scalias-death-came-at-a-good-time/article/2599014

    "I mean, the death of Scalia saved labor from a terrible decision," (Democrat Ted)Strickland said to (liberal) cheers, with (liberal)laughter soon filling the room as he made the joke. "And I don't wish anyone ill, but it happened at a good time because once that decision had been made, it would have been tough to reverse it."

    Wow..yeah...something to laugh and applaud, huh?

    Don't see that all over the libtards' propaganda sites and stations, do you?

    I think that's much worse than Trump's statement. Actually...may be that Trump was 'baiting' the leftists, to prove just how they twist anything.

    Assholes.

    ReplyDelete
  78. http://cjonline.com/blog-post/kevin-mcginty/2016-08-10/journalists-alarming-hostility-toward-trump-and-republicans?page=2

    Hammertime says: "19 shot, 9 nine dead. On Monday alone. In city ruled by Democrats. Rahm out front." Chicago, of course.

    Also, in Rahm and Barry's playground (what they have incited):

    http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/08/09/chicago-gangs-reportedly-plotting-to-shoot-cops-in-response-to-teens-death.html

    ReplyDelete
  79. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and predict that'll be mentioned in tomorrow's Open Blog Friday over at that other website...

    ReplyDelete
  80. As Kevin and I have discussed on the other site, nothing will dissuade the Dims from believing the murderous Harridan is a pure virginal debutante. The press will do ANYTHING to promote her and denigrate any Republican. Not exactly news here.

    Chicago isn't different, really, from any other Dim-run hellhole. Cities that have had changes of party administration - NYC, LA, Cleveland, Pittsburgh - have less corruption and usually lower crime. Until Dims can try to run it into the ground again. New York's ultra-lib mayor DiBlasio being the worst.

    But Baltimore, Philly, Detroit, and Miami are all about as bad as Chicago. And Boston & San Fran would be, except for demographics.

    But hey, let's make the entire US like Chicago. Elect a Cook County witch for President.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Mind if I take a quick poll now that it's too late for it to mean anything?

    Just one question: if your only choices in the November election were Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton, and you were required by law to vote for one of the two, which one would you pick?

    I know. It's a dumb poll and some people could say that if that was what they'd have to do they'd shoot themselves or go live in Latvia or anything besides make that disgusting choice. I just want to know (and I think I already know) what you guys would do.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  82. I'd vote for Sanders. I'll go further, Mousey - if the choices were between the last two Democrat first ladies, who do you think I'd vote for? Could it be ...?! But we're supposed to be wicked racists... Yep, I'd vote for Michelle.

    But like I said before, Mousey, if the choice against the Harridan was a ticket composed of Benedict Arnold and Tokyo Rose, I'll bet you can guess who I'd choose. Eggs Benedict, anyone?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's interesting, Ken. Kinda like if the republican party of the last 40 years nominated Lincoln I wouldn't vote for him nor would most of the republicans.

      Me, because I couldn't trust him because he's affiliated with them and them, because he's not the kind of republican they are.

      Delete
  83. This one's for Battlestache.
    Listen to Tommy preach.
    It's the uncensored truth.
    Coming from a black man, too.
    So no slant, right?

    Enjoy.

    https://youtu.be/aDt56Z0-peY

    ReplyDelete