Wednesday, February 8, 2017

There's a Civil War underway. And the Republican party needs to fight it



The godless left is at war with America. Whether it's rioting to shut down free speech and any opposing opinion to democrat legislators using lies and deception to attempt to persuade the American people of blatant untruths, they are at war with us.

You see it every day. I don't need to list any of the examples, just turn on the news or look at the news websites. It's everywhere. It's at a level of hysteria not seen in this country since the last Civil War.

Any pretense of rational discourse has been abandoned by the godless left. It has been replaced with riots and shouting and hate speech. Today I read Republicans are having to take security measures never before considered during town halls due to violent left wing protestors showing up posing a direct threat to their safety and to the safety of others.

How did we get here? Long story. But it has been happening since the 1960s when the Marxists and Communists took over the democrat party. When the Frankfurt School of Communists left Germany and came here and the likes of Antonio Gramsci began their work to infiltrate and change the culture of America.

See, those people figured out that you overthrow a civil society by changing the culture. Infiltrate the schools, universities. Infiltrate the media. Infiltrate Hollywood. Infiltrate one of the political parties.

Teach disrespect for tradition. Hatred for the prevalent religious beliefs. Twist the narrative. Free love. Don't trust the man. Rebel against everything. Take drugs. Free your mind. And so on. And look where it got us some 50 years later.

The interesting thing is if you watch the mainstream media you would think this was America. The riots, the screaming and yelling and vandalism and burning and destruction was America protesting the election of a fascist racist president. But it's not.

It's the ravings of the minority. They are the loudest and are doing the most damage, but they are not representative of the majority. The majority is getting up everyday and going to work. Coming home and playing with their kids. Serving in the military. Enjoying their retirement after a lifetime of hard work. Watching ball games. Grilling hamburgers. Going to church. Respecting each other and helping those in need. We don't have time to riot and counter demonstrate. We have jobs, families. Responsibilities.

We demonstrated over the last eight years by voting over a thousand of these characters out of office and replacing them with Republicans. And voting Donald Trump into the Presidency. We still think that's how you express how you believe and the direction you want the country to go.

But that's not how the left operates. And unless we wake up and realize what we are up against this country is in big trouble. I had a little ray of hope yesterday when Mitch McConnell made fauxcahauntus Elizabeth Warren sit down and shut up during the Sessions hearing. Maybe there's a light at the end of the tunnel. I hope so.

#Making America Great Again!


26 comments:

  1. Good blog Safe, The high light Warren shut the hell up follow the rules or get out.

    ReplyDelete
  2. And President Trump is correct that when the courts decide they have the power to decide national security issues over the President something is very very wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Something very wrong indeed.

    And you're right, there is light at the end of the tunnel.

    It's a long tunnel and it could take decades to finally reach it.

    But reach it we must...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Headline on the CJ Urinal:

    Senate GOP silences Elizabeth Warren over criticism of Jeff Sessions

    Not Elizabeth Warren commits egregious violation of Senate rules after being warned, and is silenced for duration of hearing per Senate rules. That's what actually happened.

    But is really sounds better that she was silenced!! by the evil Republicans who are afraid of the truth.

    Just in case you had any doubts that the Urinal was a godless left wing democrat rag of a former newspaper.

    ReplyDelete
  5. President Trump is correct - we know it - the ding a ling libs don't want to acknowledge Trump is right on this....illegal immigrants "bad hombres" are here in the USA.... the media needs to focus on stuff like this to support Trumps' policies....instead of being obstinate about things.

    From the Wichita Eagle: He had a criminal record. "He was deported 7 times. And he kept coming back"

    http://www.kansas.com/news/nation-world/national/article131437009.html

    This story is about a group of illegals who (handcuffed) boarded a jet back to their country! There needs to be a lot more of this!

    And I applaud the GOP silencing Elizabeth Warren.... wished I had a heads up on that because I would have loved to be a "fly on the wall" when that happened....

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is from the Miami Herald - Hundreds of immigrants convicted and not deported committed more crimes — even murder

    Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/immigration/article131227599.html#storylink=cpy

    Why there isn't widespread coverage of stuff like this is beyond me and makes zero sense....

    If more stuff that support President Trump's stand on things get out in the media there wouldn't be so much ding a ling lib crapola!


    ReplyDelete
  7. Trump wins another Session confirmed Dem's whining!

    ReplyDelete
  8. RED ALERT: SHOCK – After Liberals Halted Trump Order, Look Who U.S. Border Patrol Just Caught Trying To Sneak In! [Video]


    The U.S. Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Border Patrol agents reportedly apprehended two individuals who were attempting to sneak across the border Saturday — but they weren’t the customary illegal aliens from Mexico or Central America.

    http://rightalertspolls.com/red-alert-shock-after-liberals-halted-trump-order-look-who-u-s-border-patrol-just-caught-trying-to-sneak-in-video/

    ReplyDelete
  9. To bolster Safe's point about the radical-left run colleges...in today's edition of the leftist Topeepot Capital Urinal:

    http://cjonline.com/opinion/columns/2017-02-08/albert-r-hunt-don-t-expect-commencement-speeches-trump

    "Don’t look for President Donald Trump this spring on these or most other well-known campuses. He would face disruptive protests that would extend beyond the halls of academe."

    Doesn't even matter what the context might be be....the fascists demand he be silenced.

    "For Trump, with his proposed immigration ban and penchant for racial, ethnic, sexist and other insults, the phenomenon has occurred almost instantly."

    Well...with his penchant for "telling it like it is, and NOT what they want to hear", anyway.

    "Unfriendly venues appear to be spreading."

    Soros still has plenty of money, and there are still plenty of brainwashed sheeple.

    "Efforts are underway to organize a national worker’s strike later this month against the president’s policies. There’s even an online calendar for anti-Trump rallies being scheduled in the months ahead."

    Well, on that day, I will PROUDLY GO TO WORK!! The shiftless, lazy liberals can all stay home. Here's hoping some get fired for not doing what they agreed to do when they accepted their jobs. I may even put a big ol' cardboard sign on my back vehicle window, denouncing the protest!

    Not sure which "calender" he referred to, but here are a couple:

    http://iacenter.org/1947/shut-down-trump-rnc-protest-calendar/

    (That one looks to have some racist-extremist events in it. Odds are, BLM Terrorist Group will be present).

    https://www.bustle.com/p/upcoming-anti-donald-trump-protests-occurring-worldwide-to-mark-on-your-calendars-34067

    (Yeah...looking like they have no real cohesive thing...just toss in ANYthing, huh?)

    https://popularresistance.org/calendar/

    (This next one looks appropriate, as it appears to be quite "Satanic-themed" in its appearance.)

    http://www.protest.net/

    (Here's one from the Californicated land of Colorado):

    https://collegian.com/2017/01/timeline-of-upcoming-post-election-protests-and-rallies/

    (OH! Here's one APPARENTLY ran by Google, itself! Makes you wonder how much we can REALLY trust Google, and the Google Android devices. Well...as little as Facebook, Microsoft, Apple, etc, I guess.)

    Anyway...that's enough insanity-exposing for today.

    Have a good day!





    ReplyDelete
  10. Photographs show that a Wichita State University rally against campus carry drew 15 people on Tuesday, counting the speaker.
    The rally was in support of proposed legislation that would undo campus carry for law-abiding citizens, forcing said citizens to wander the campus defenseless like everybody else.

    According to KMUW, “a small group” of students and staff rallied the Rhatigan Student Center. Their motto was “Carry Minds, Not Guns.”

    Freshman Ian Englebright said campus carry “creates more problems than solutions.” He said lawmakers who supported guns for self-defense “think that by having concealed carry on this campus they’re making it safer, when in fact, I feel more uncomfortable because I don’t know if the person next to me has a gun or not.”

    The 15 person rally at Wichita State was designed to pressure lawmakers into adopting a revision of the state’s campus carry law. That revision would allow colleges and universities to opt out of campus carry, creating a situation like we currently see in Ohio, where campus carry is legal at the state level but barred by every college and university because some students get nervous when law-abiding citizens are armed for self-defense. Read More:

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/02/08/kansas-rally-campus-carry-draws-15-people/

    ReplyDelete
  11. OOOPS!

    The "Google Maps" one:

    https://www.google.com/maps/d/embed?mid=1KBeeazHJMtrOquJOwUNsDGYbDzU&wmode=opaque&ll=38.971010795143805%2C-128.65300808749998&z=4

    Very handy for Google to do that, for the budding anarchists, and the seasoned commies, as well!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sarge, they were too specific in the subject, apparently. Maybe they would have had a larger turnout if they had specifically interjected race, gender, gender-confusion, or the "climate change" myth into it all, somehow?

    That would have brought out the entire colony of filthy cockroaches!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Kev, your "Remain Calm" blog "over there" is 100% spot-on.

    That should get the tender little libs' heads spinning, spewing pea-soup and uttering profanities!!!

    (I'm SURE you didn't intend to do THAT...right?)

    Hahahaaaa!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Of course I didn't intend to do THAT.

    I think we can all agree that I'm pretty big on finding COMMON GROUND.

    NOT!!!

    ReplyDelete
  15. This line from the delicate little snowflake on the campus carry story just says it all. He says lawmakers.....

    “think that by having concealed carry on this campus they’re making it safer, when in fact, I feel more uncomfortable because I don’t know if the person next to me has a gun or not.”

    So because this delicate little snowflake is "uncomfortable" because he is a radical left wing hyper partisan who has been told that is how he is supposed to feel, even though that defies all facts and reality, the rest of us are supposed to surrender our own safety and live in his world of flying unicorns and rainbows.

    Fact is, there are dangerous people on our campuses now, some with terrorist intentions as we have seen, stopped by a good guy with a gun, and some with domestic terrorist intentions as we saw in Berkley. None of those people are legal conceal carry citizens. They are criminals, terrorists and violent thugs. The people who are arming themselves are doing so to protect themselves from the likes of those people.

    The godless left wants America disarmed to make us defenseless against those who wish to destroy our society. And we ain't having it.

    Sorry godless lefties. You had your chance and you wasted it on destroying our healthcare, wrecking our economy and flooding the country with illegal aliens. And it cost you 1,100 legislative seats, including the House, the Senate and the Presidency. Maybe you haven't figured it out yet, but now it's our turn. And our guns aren't going anywhere. And if that makes you uncomfortable, well tough shit.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  18. It's good to see mention of the Frankfurt school here. Understanding critical theory is imperative to understanding leftist thinking. As you said, (((those people))) infiltrated politics, the media, and intelligentsia. Virtually all of the cultural and academic gate-keepers were replaced by (((those people))). You see, they didn't explicitly teach hate, they taught cultural Marxism -critical theory- and used the ISA. Let me define my terms.

    Cultural Marxism: A school or offshoot of Marxism that conceives of culture as central to the legitimization of oppression, in addition to the economic factors that Karl Marx emphasized.

    ISA: A term developed by the Marxist theorist Louis Althusser to describe the process of education by the state to take the place of religion as a means for behavioral enforcement. In ISA theory, knowledge and ideology become unified; so that through education an ideology my be indoctrinated into the subject (primarily young adults and children).

    As academia (the state) pushed an ideology (SJWism, 3rd wave feminism, & general cultural and mental cancer) it became less and less popular to oppose it. Because it originated in academia with pseudo intellectuals who called anyone who opposed their thinking bigots, it became taboo to criticize these people publicly. Because it originated in academia, it is considered stupid and uneducated to not believe the narrative. Thus, anyone who does not buy into the ideology is invalidated as an actual critic of the subject on the grounds of being stupid. A vicious cycle for authentic critics.
    The ideological state apparatus is a method of social engineering and behavioral control pushing an ideology of cultural Marxism. Obviously not everyone is brainwashed, most people just want to be left alone. The mistake they made the university I attended was literally teaching us about the ISA, and telling us that our research had to do "social good" I was disillusioned instantly.

    The irony being that now it is considered edgy to be conservative, and more importantly, nationalistic. Traditionally the left is the group youth run to in order to rebel, now that the left is in power, the right is welcoming the rebellious kids with open arms. It's a good day when the left undoes itself, and while unsurprising since the left is self-defeating, it is pleasant and somewhat comforting.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Just had to laugh and share this with you! I was just over on Kevin's blog on the urinal and Kalya had made a reply about Bart and the Electoral College. I simply wrote the following as a comment about what Kalya had said:
    The Electoral College would have been just peachy with Bart and those like thinking Liberals, IF Hillary had just done what she was supposed to do and win the election! Those darn Russians anyway!
    Thing is, when I tried to post it, I got the old "post is under review" by the moderators! I tried it again and t got the same thing. As an experiment, I took off the last sentence about the Russians and tried to post it separately. Still no cigar! Posted the comment without the "Darn Russians" comment, and it took that time! Now that is a pretty touchy system, don't you think? Wonder if it was the word "darn" or the word "Russians" that tipped the scale! Just thought it was funny!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Gary it was darn word some word I removed a while back, Oh and good morning everyone.

    ReplyDelete

  21. The Canadians know how to handle complaints.

    Here is an example.
    A Canadian female liberal wrote a number of letters to the Canadian government, complaining about the treatment of captive insurgents (terrorists) being held in Afghanistan National Correctional System facilities. She demanded a response to her letter.

    She received the following reply:

    National Defense Headquarters
    M Gen George R. Pearkes Bldg., 15 NT
    101 Colonel By Drive
    Ottawa , ON K1A 0K2
    Canada

    Dear Concerned Citizen,

    Thank you for your recent letter expressing your profound concern of our treatment of the Taliban and Al Qaeda terrorists captured by Canadian Forces, who were subsequently transferred to the Afghanistan Government and are currently being held by Afghan officials in Afghanistan National Correctional System facilities.

    Our administration takes these matters seriously and your opinions were heard loud and clear here in Ottawa .. You will be pleased to learn, thanks to the concerns of citizens like yourself, we are creating a new department here at the Department of National Defense, to be called 'Liberals Accept Responsibility for Killers' program, or L.A.R.K. for short.

    In accordance with the guidelines of this new program, we have decided, on a trial basis, to divert several terrorists and place them in homes of concerned citizens such as yourself, around the country, under those citizens personal care. Your personal detainee has been selected and is scheduled for transportation under heavily armed guard to your residence in Toronto next Monday.

    Ali Mohammed Ahmed bin Mahmud is your detainee, and is to be cared for pursuant to the standards you personally demanded in your letter of complaint. You will be pleased to know that we will conduct weekly inspections to ensure that your standards of care for Ahmed are commensurate with your recommendations.
    Although Ahmed is a sociopath and extremely violent, we hope that your sensitivity to what you described as his 'attitudinal problem' will help him overcome those character flaws. Perhaps you are correct in describing these problems as mere cultural differences. We understand that you plan to offer counselling and home schooling, however, we strongly recommend that you hire some assistant caretakers.

    Please advise any Jewish friends, neighbours or relatives about your house guest, as he might get agitated or even violent, but we are sure you can reason with him. He is also expert at making a wide variety of explosive devices from common household products, so you may wish to keep those items locked up, unless in your opinion, this might offend him. Your adopted terrorist is extremely proficient in hand-to-hand combat and can extinguish human life with such simple items as a pencil or nail clippers. We advise that you do not ask him to demonstrate these skills either in your home or wherever you choose to take him while helping him adjust to life in our country.

    Ahmed will not wish to interact with you or your daughters except sexually, since he views females as a form of property, thereby having no rights, including refusal of his sexual demands. This is a particularly sensitive subject for him.

    You also should know that he has shown violent tendencies around women who fail to comply with the dress code that he will recommend as more appropriate attire. I'm sure you will come to enjoy the anonymity offered by the burka over time. Just remember that it is all part of respecting his culture and religious beliefs' as described in your letter.

    You take good care of Ahmed and remember that we will try to have a counsellor available to help you over any difficulties you encounter while Ahmed is adjusting to Canadian culture.

    Thanks again for your concern. We truly appreciate it when folks like you keep us informed of the proper way to do our job and care for our fellow man. Good luck and God bless you.

    Cordially,
    Gordon O'Connor
    Minister of National Defense

    ReplyDelete
  22. Good Friday morning!

    Guessing what the new blog, up soon probably, will be about?

    The 9th Circuit ignoring laws and the Constitution, perhaps?

    Consider this:

    The 9th Circuit has an 80% reversal rate in the U.S. Supreme Court.

    What other entity on Earth allows an 80% reject rate?!

    Can you imagine ANY company with any product continuing with an 80% reject rate?!

    WHY is this court ALLOWED to continue with such a high reject rate?

    Manufacturers strive for 0% reject rate, but realize it's all initially human-created, and subject to occasional human error, in parts, procedures, whatever. So, they allow a very small percentage as normal...say 2%...and once they identify a cause for rejects, most reputable companies enact measures to correct the flaws.

    WHO in the world would allow a consistent 80% reject rate, EXCEPT for our government?

    If that Ciicuit Court is so badly flawed that they can only get it right about 20% of the time, shouldn't the obviously-broken parts be replaced, and the problem corrected?

    I HATE even more laws, but here's something Congress should consider:

    If a Circuit Court has over a (XX%) amount of Supreme Court reversals, that means the Circuit Court is OBVIOUSLY ignorant of the laws and Constitution, derelict of duty to perform their jobs according to the oaths they took to "protect and preserve the Constitution of the United States of America", have an agenda, are just plain incompetent, or any combination of those.

    All decisions should be investigated, and any judge(s) who were responsible for any overturned ruling will be recorded and tallied. Judges who were the minority decision will not be tallied, as they should not be held responsible for the reversed decision.

    Any judge who reaches (or has already exceeded) (XX%) of involvement in numbers of cases that were overturned are obviously not fit to serve, and must immediately be removed from the bench, and never allowed to hold a judicial position again, in their lifetime.

    They are supposed to be ENFORCING and PROTECTING the Constitution and laws. NOT rewriting them!! Courts should not be allowed to "create laws", or to prevent actions that are clearly Constitutional. Period.

    The ONLY thing in this case that should have been considered was "did the President have the authority, under the Constitution, to do what he did?"

    Clearly, he did, as Presidents prior to him, including Obama, have done the same thing.



    ReplyDelete