Is it just me or is anyone else tired of hearing Barack Hussein Obama go on about how just a tiny fraction of Muslims are terrorists?
I'm going to throw out a few numbers today and then ask you to give me 15 minutes to listen to what this Muslim woman has to say about the president's bullshit.
79 to 86% of Muslims in Afghanistan, Egypt, and Jordan believe anyone leaving the Muslim faith should be executed.
27% of Muslims elsewhere around the world believe anyone leaving the Muslim faith should be executed. That equals roughly 237 million people.
39% of all Muslims surveyed believe honor killings are justifiable. That equals 345 million people.
Western Muslims between 18 and 29 years old believe suicide bombings can be justified.
French Muslims--- 42%
British Muslims--- 35%
American Muslims--- 26%
And this is the next generation.
53% of Muslims in Muslim controlled countries Sharia Law should be the law of the land.
And 52% support public whippings, stoning to death, and cutting of the hands of thieves.
So much for Obama's bullshit narrative about the religion of peace, huh?
Like I said, give me 15 minutes of your time to hear this woman with first hand knowledge explain that that tiny fraction equals literally hundreds of millions of people.
Kevin McGinty
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Solo Expedition...
I haven't really talked about it much but every other weekend I usually head out by myself. It's usually the day I seek out new fis...
-
Have I ever told you about “Lone Duck“ campground? It’s in Cadorado. That’s how my grandson used to pronounce Colorado. You see, we’ve taken...
-
Imagine if you will, a world being run by insane people. Hell, you don't have to imagine it. Just look around. Just two short years ago ...
Never trust anyone that is fundamentally allowed to lie, to push an agenda to further religious law and beliefs on others.
ReplyDeleteAlways judge a group of people by how they treat their women.
And remember Ali snack bar is real.
See him, before he sees you.....
Amen...
ReplyDeleteThere's nothing worse than people with devious ulterior motives, like say the destruction of America's entire civil society manipulating sad pathetic uninformed naive blind followers who blindly support and defend the lies told by their evil masters.
ReplyDeleteThe old Soviet aparachiks called these people useful idiots because that's exactly what they are.
The followers of iman barack hussein obama age just such people. Too stupid to understand the motives of this man but blindly defending everything he says and does.
Our country is filled with these people. Mao had the Red Guard. Hitler had legions of people loyal to him at the expense of their country. George Soros was one of those people by the way. The primary source of funding for the ungodly left and the man who formed obama into the political animal he is was a Nazi supporter to save his own skin.
Despots have always had loyal followers right up to their turn up against the wall.
The people we are facing today are the worst of these.
Good morning. Nunya here.
ReplyDeletehttp://muslimfact.com/bm/terror-in-the-name-of-islam/islam-permits-lying-to-deceive-unbelievers-and-bri.shtml
al-Taqiyya:
deception; the islamic word for concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/taqiyya.aspx
Quran (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves" against danger, meaning that there are times when a Muslim should appear friendly to non-Muslims, even though they should not feel that way..
Quran (3:54) - "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means 'deceit'. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)
There's much more.
They are pretty much told to lie and use deceit about their faith and intentions, if necessary, to spread Islam.
One can even be a devout Muslim, and claim he is a Christian, to achieve a goal of islamic superiority.
Kev asks: "Is it just me or is anyone else tired of hearing Barack Hussein Obama go on about how just a tiny fraction of Muslims are terrorists?"
Obama's refusal to even mildly scold Islam-anything...even the most horrific acts...and his always-quick defense of Islam in the wake of all those terrible murderous tragedies....
...well...I'm starting to not just "wonder" about his motives.
It seems pretty clear though his actions, mannersims and words.
Especially...the intentional weakening of everything in this country, and the constant, unrelenting racist/gender/religious/everything divisiveness of EVERYONE to further weaken us.
What else could it be?
Watched the second video and thought it was very interesting but didn't it prove that the problem is not Islam more than it is religion as a basis for governing? Aren't there religious extremists here who, every day, call their perceived enemies "unholy" and "ungodly?" Aren't there people here who are never challenged by those same religious extremists when they vilely curse and threaten physical harm?
ReplyDeleteMatthew 7:3-5
3 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
4 Or how wilt thou say to thy brother, Let me pull out the mote out of thine eye; and, behold, a beam is in thine own eye?
5 Thou hypocrite, first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye.
Mousey, Safe may think you're "ungodly," but when has he tried to harm you? Has he threatened anybody with harm? I know you might think ridicule is "hurtful," but that hardly compares with drowning in a cage or a nice public beheading, now does it?
ReplyDeleteYou might as well can the religious stuff with me. I'm pretty sure you know what weight that carries with The Remf.
Are you intentionally ignoring what I wrote knowing that people here who read your reply will not read my questions? How did you become comfortable with such intellectual dishonesty?
DeleteMousey, I'm being as brutally honest as I can. ANY equivalency between a jihadist and a Christian fundy is fatuous - I refer to actions, not motivations. I could care less about what motivates evil actions. How is THAT being intellectually dishonest?
DeleteNot to put too fine a line on it, but I'm pretty sure I'm a little more familiar with Muslims than you are. While I lived as a civilian there for 7 years, you might have gotten close to one at the Monsoon Grill, right? And hey, I know most Muslims aren't violent. Neither are most Klansmen. But the ones who are can cause a lot of damage, eh?
I'm sorry but when you made out in your first post, above, that I'd even obliquely suggested that Safe had tried physically to harm or threaten me with harm you were being dishonest. You perpetuate the dishonesty when you try to make an equivalency between "a jihadist" and "a Christian fundy," dismissing the false parallel with a supercilious "fatuous," knowing it will come off authoritative when it's really devoid of meaning--even refined by some reference to "actions, not motivations."
DeleteHow, as a former prosecutor, could you say you could "care less" about motives knowing that intent is a necessary element in the criminality of many acts?
I do, though, acknowledge your identification of a Christian extremist group, the KKK, known to have engaged in violence and appreciate the mention. I'll go further with you in this dialogue since that event and request that you comment about religion as a basis for governing. Specifically, I think it's necessary to have some moral underpinning in law but how and where do you draw the line?
Hand, YOU were the one who brought up "religious extremists" who use terms like "ungodly," not me. You chose the terms of the discussion and I chose to address them. At any rate, it appears that only one person on 235 would even think of harming you. And that's because you tried to lead a little lynch mob of your own on him back at cj. I remember that. I also remember only Safe and (of all people) Lucy backing me when I suggested waiting until all facts were in. You know, it was sort of like "The Ox-Bow Incident." So you're a strange one to be questioning my judicial temperament. But to answer your Q, I'm not prosecuting the people involved, so I don't need to worry about their motives. And I don't.
DeleteI think a lot of religious teaching underpin a lot of law. So long as there's a consensus, all is fine. Murder & theft - all bad according to every religion. But codifying other religious precepts into law can be tricky. Nonetheless, I don't deign to have an answer for all of these issues. As soldier, prosecutor, bureaucrat, county official and yes, even contractor; I enforce or at most interpret some law. Mostly I, like everyone else, abide by it.
All that but no rebuke for the guy who'll show up any moment now and type, "Fuck off, puke, or show up at the Summit so we won't have to shoot at only stationary targets."
ReplyDeleteAgain, directed to you, how have you become so comfortable with intellectual dishonesty?
Why do I call the left unholy and ungodly? Maybe it's this:
ReplyDelete15 “Watch out for false prophets. They come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ferocious wolves. 16 By their fruit you will recognize them. Do people pick grapes from thornbushes, or figs from thistles? 17 Likewise, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, and a bad tree cannot bear good fruit. 19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. 20 Thus, by their fruit you will recognize them."
Matthew 7; 15-20
So I see the fruit of the ungodly left. Murder of unborn children. Forcing Christians to accept sexual perversion as normal. Forcing the Little Sisters of the Poor to pay for birth control and abortion drugs. Stealing from some to reward others who won't work. Cursing God's name and showing contempt for his church.
And the worst of all, the heretics using God's word which they don't believe to be true to attempt to refute Christians. They search the bible looking for loopholes instead of truth.
But when you read other people's mail and try to make some application from it you often get confused. See mouse, you left out the next line from that scripture you quoted. This is the part where he was addressing you appropriating his holy words:
6 “Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces. Matthew 7, verse 6.
We're getting far afield here. Is there a way to prune the rhetoric and address the issue, whether religion is a good basis from which to govern rather than comparing known systems of governing based on religion?
DeleteMaybe a start could be listing things that ought to be universally recognized as rights and responsibilities of people in modern, civilized society?
I'll decide for myself who I reply to and who I don't. That's not intellectual dishonesty. That's my choice. I find the ungodly left to be a real and persistent threat to my way of life. Somebody saying something that you are offended by is of no interest to me.
ReplyDeleteI'll let you take it up with the person who said whatever you were offended with. How's that mouse? Show a little intellectual honesty yourself. Don't demand I fight your battles for you. Do it yourself. I'm not a liberal. I frankly don't care if your feelings are hurt. And we don't have safe spaces for you to retreat to when your feelings are hurt. This isn't the CJ urinal where buttstash decides who gets to say what. This is the land of free speech, and we understand what that means.
Capt that isn't minnow, that is the whiner MWN, minnow couldn't type that many words.
ReplyDeleteWrong-O Sarge. It's Hand-job. Trust me on this one.
ReplyDeleteI tend to agree with Ken on this one. This is hand job in his civil discussion phase where he pretends to want to have an honest debate. He does this because he believes himself to be smarter than any of us and in his imaginary world he can best us in a debate with one hand tied behind his back.
ReplyDeleteBut soon enough, after enough thorough rebukes and having his arguments disassembled and handed back to him the real hand job will show up. The nasty, name calling hate filled one that will soon enough make his appearance.
SSAH, I really could care less, Hand job had his wimpy ass chance to confront me in one of his safe space the courthouse with all the security around him, and the worthless pieces of shit didn't have the guts to show up.
ReplyDeleteContrary to popular wisdom, there is a way that I can change your mind--or, maybe, I'm just so conceited I think I can. In any event, for the record, your characterization of Islam as a "savage belief system" might be a start for the list that I proposed earlier.
ReplyDeleteSarge, I hear you. I think our friend the hand job giving mouse has a habit of his canary brain writing checks his alligator ass can't cash.
ReplyDeleteShoot, he's trying to claim he can change my mind about something. I guess he thinks with his brilliant wit and just the right turn of a phrase he'll catch me off guard and trip me up.
He'd have better luck getting a Bernie the commie supporter to take a bath and get a job than changing my mind about anything.
What happen to that peckerhead handjob ? Must have gotten carried away in his closet. Don't worry mousey keep playing with it it might get bigger.
ReplyDeleteSure ain't very friendly! How would a guy like that ever fit in at the summit?
ReplyDeleteHe'd make a good beer runner...
ReplyDeleteI don't want him touching my beer. You don't know where those hands have been. Besides the whole bathroom issue would be very confusing for the poor mixed up liberals.
ReplyDeleteHey here's an idea. Let's find a gay cake baker and have them bake a cake for the summit with a men's and women's outhouse on it. It can say use your own bathroom. Then when they won't do it we'll sue them.