Looks Like The Science Isn't So Settled After All...

   

I know how much you dedicated global warming believers love your science.

And I know you like nothing more than claiming the whole thing is settled science and that your imaginary global warming boogeyman is going to kill us all.

If this rock solid science you base your entire belief system on is so settled why is it that the American Physical Society ( I assume you've heard of them) rethinking their position by appointing three notorious climate skeptics to it's panel of public affairs (POPA)?

Professor of Meteorlogy Richard Lindzen from MIT.

http://www-eaps.mit.edu/faculty/lindzen.htm

John Christy, Professor of Atmospheric Science at the University of Alabama in Huntsville.

http://nsstc.uah.edu/users/john.christy/about.html

Judith Curry, Chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-heretic/

You don't suppose it has anything to do with one of their most distinguised members, Professor Hal Lewis resigned in disgust at the Society's endorsement of what he called the "global warming scam" do you?

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/03/20/American-Physical-Society-Sees-The-Light-Will-It-Be-The-First-Major-Scientific-Institution-To-Reject-The-Global-Warming-Consensus

Surely not.

There's no doubt the true believers among us will call each and every one of the scientists quacks and do everything in their limited power to discredit all three of them.

Nothing new there.

But.

But are you willing to call out one of the largest and most respected scientific organizations in the world as a bunch of flat earthers.

Of course you will.

Face it global warming believers, the gig is up.

One last thought before I get out of here.

Farmgirl: Thank you for bringing this topic up the other day. It was well worth checking into...

Kevin McGinty