Well, guys I'm up to my eyeballs on a blog concerning democrat controlled cities (shit holes) and I can't for the life of me figure out why anyone could vote for any of them.
Hopefully I'll have it put together by Wednesday but in the meantime I'm just gonna throw this out there for a little perspective.
I know I sound like a broken record but these aren't rational people we're dealing with...
Kevin McGinty
Oh Good Grief! Yup and they think Nadler has a brain also,
ReplyDeleteAnd a good morning to you all in room 235...
Well I guess Iwill go try for some Z's...
ReplyDeleteWell just can't seem to fall asleep Bummer...
ReplyDeleteNothing to lose, must try again...
ReplyDeleteGood grief Sarge...
ReplyDeleteOh, and not only do those who believe Bruce Jenner is a woman even though he has a penis they're trying to force us to believe it as well.
ReplyDeleteThese people need serious help...
YupI think a 12 gauge would work...
ReplyDeleteI'm second to no one in my dislike of nad-less Nadler, but it seems one of AOC's cohorts is trying to primary him, so he's trying to head them off at the pass. Explaining his impeachment fervor. He knows they'll never convict. Can he survive the socialist challenge? Who knows? And if a socialist is going to unseat an incumbent, Nadler and Schiff are among the most deserving ones.
ReplyDeleteBut the thought of more AOCs and Omars is a bit much.
Yup the squat Squad is a bit to much, don't need anymore.
ReplyDeleteTalking about men who want us to think they are women; Did you see the one who is suing a manicurist (I guess) because she or they refused to do some grooming (waxing I guess!) around his private parts! I wish they would do some grooming there, with a straight-edge razor!
ReplyDeleteAll of these idiots are playing the worthless "elected" officials right and left, because they know most of them will do anything for a vote and will not "offend" anybody except "Old white people" who, it seems to be a requirement, that they must be offended!
What a bunch of worthless assholes that we have in charge! Thank God for President Trump and the few we have who still have some common sense and understanding of the Constitution! My God, I shudder at the thought still of Hillary Clinton ever becoming President!
That's a night Mare Gary...
DeleteHistory...
ReplyDeleteDuring the dead of winter, March 21st 1944; Miles City, Montana; local residents woke to their quaint little town being overrun and submerged by the rising frozen waters of the Yellowstone river. Ice jams were building quickly, raising the subzero river water levels over 16 feet. As the blocks of ice, slush and freezing waters flooded into the city, residents were forced to flee their homes for safer grounds.
Miles City Mayor L.S. Keye knew immediate action must be taken, and brought in explosive experts from a nearby town. Two local pilots took a small aircraft over the river and attempted to drop and detonate 50 pound homemade bombs on the Yellowstone ice jam , but unfortunately it had little effect.
Mayor L.S. Keye then decided to do the unthinkable, and placed an urgent request to the Governor’s office.
His request was short, and to the point "Send in the Bombers!"
At a USAA base in Rapid City S.D., the crew of an B-17 were quick to accept the unusual mission, and preparations to bomb an American city were fast underway. The crew hastily began fusing and loading 250-pound bombs into the bomb bay of their Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress. Shortly thereafter, the loaded bomber with her crew of eight, took to the skies in a harsh blizzard and low ceilings.
The plan was to deliver the bombs to Miles City where the load would be transferred to a waiting Dive-Bomber to execute the bomb delivery. As the lone B-17 was nearing Miles City, low clouds forced the plans to be changed. Under a blanket of 1000 foot overcast skies, the B-17 was then ordered to handle the bombing run themselves.
Originally planned to release the load at 10,000 feet, the low overcast forced the bomber crew to take their ship lower. At 1930 hours, in heavy snow, winds and cold, the bomber appeared over the river and executed two dummy bombing runs as crowds of locals watched in amazement. On the third pass, the B-17 released a test bomb that exploded precisely on target. Unsure of the effect, the crew brought their bomber around again.
Making a two more passes, releasing all six of the 250 lb. bombs. Hundreds of residents watched motionless, and none speaking a word. The entire town, their homes and their families future hung in the balance as they watched the bombs fall. Seconds later a huge plume of ice, mud and water exploded skyward from the frozen Yellowstone river.
The ice jam quickly broke apart, and the frozen waters slowly receded, saving the small town. The next morning, local residents were thrilled to watch as the water levels had dropped a full 10 feet from the day before.
That night the crew of the B-17 were welcomed by the thankful and relieved residents of Miles City Montana. The entire crew were put up at the local hotel, and each received a well-deserved steak dinner.
The next morning, the crew departed, and the B-17 made a final victory pass low over the town at 50 feet over the rooftops, rocking their wings as they flew back home to Rapid City SD... and so the story goes of the only time the continental United States was bombed.
Good Grief...
ReplyDeletePhoning On The Golf Course
One morning at breakfast he asks:
Honey, why don't you ever tell me when you are having an orgasm?
She replies:
You asked me not to phone you when you're golfing.
Good grief...
ReplyDeleteKevin ignore my email I sent. For some reason I have lost the ability to post on here from my phone. Wrote a profound reaction to the Baltimore saga only to see it wiped out. Never mind. Doesn't seem as profound now.
ReplyDeleteLol... Just as well. For whatever reason I can't access my email. I'm gonna have to have one of my kids fix it for me...
ReplyDeleteWell it is getting close to that time to call it a good night, trying to make it to 8 o' clock, oh what the hell, what's 15 min, good night all...
ReplyDeleteGood Morning Bunker world...
ReplyDeleteDaily info...
ReplyDelete48 People Shot, 9 Fatally, over Weekend in Democrat-Controlled Chicago. Imagine that.
Weekend: Five Shot Dead in Baltimore, Page two!!
ReplyDeleteYup, the DemOrats are nothing but takers and shakers. And low life to boot.
ReplyDeleteLol... I can hardly wait to see what the dipshits are outraged by today...
ReplyDeleteMost likely their own miserable life's.
ReplyDeletegood morning
ReplyDeletejust saw this on the Washington Times:
(feeds into your upcoming blog)
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jul/29/donald-trumps-racist-tweets-highlight-troubled-us-/
Trump's 'racist' tweets a reminder that most troubled U.S. cities run by Dems
"Democrats condemned Monday as racist President Trump’s broadside at “rodent infested” Baltimore, but the blast also came as a reminder that most troubled major U.S. cities have been dominated for decades by one party, and it isn’t the GOP."
"Cities like Baltimore, Chicago, Detroit, Portland, San Francisco and St. Louis plagued by a host of social and economic ills have been run nearly continuously by Democratic mayors and councils. As far as Republicans are concerned, that’s no coincidence."
________
just saw a projection of cost regarding AOC's Green New Deal....
ReplyDeletefolks, y'all know it's ridiculous.... but if it actually passes.... it is going to hit America very hard in the pocket book.....
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jul/30/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-green-new-deal-cost-70k/
AOC's Green New Deal would cost $70K-plus per household in first year: Study
Research by free-market think-tanks estimates costs in five states
By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times - Tuesday, July 30, 2019
__
Some excerpts from the article....
In five model states — Alaska, Florida, New Hampshire, New Mexico and Pennsylvania — the ambitious resolution aimed at achieving net-zero emissions by 2030 would come at a high price to consumers, said researchers at the free-market groups Power for the Future and the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
“Economists and experts have been warning us for months about the devastating effects of the Green New Deal, and now we have the numbers to prove it,” said Daniel Turner, Executive Director of Power the Future. “This study only calculates a fraction of the cost of Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez’s radical plan, which amounts to a socialist free-for-all with no regard for the American taxpayer.”
Alaska would experience the highest cost increase at $100,505 per household in the first year, dropping to $73,092 in years 2-5, and $67,536 in the sixth year and thereafter, the research found.
In the other four states, the cost per household in the first year ranged from $73,010 to $71,910, with the price tag dropping to about $38,000 in year six. The 2016 U.S. average real median household income was $59,039, according to the U.S. Census.
“Our analysis shows that, if implemented, the Green New Deal would cost for American households at least tens of thousands of dollars annually on a permanent basis,” said CEI President and CEO Kent Lassman. “Perhaps that’s why exactly zero Senate Democrats, including the resolution’s 12 co-sponsors, voted for the Green New Deal when they had the chance.”
_____________
Dunno about y'all but this would plunge the economy into worse than the Depression!
AOC's Green New Deal is an economy breaker!
DeleteOooh..... this is interesting
ReplyDeletehttps://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/455255-dccc-faces-mass-staff-shakeup-its-the-monday-night-massacre
DCCC faces mass staff shakeup: 'It's the Monday Night Massacre'
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) saw a mass departure of senior staff late Monday amid outcry over the lack of diversity within the committee's top ranks under Chairwoman Cheri Bustos (D-Ill.).
_____
Y'all.... these folks are the only political committee in the country whose principal mission is to support Democratic House candidates every step of the way to fortify and to expand our the Democratic Majority.....
The dummycrats fighting among themselves went to a whole new level!
I went to the DCCC website to get what their mission was..... that's the "the only political committee in the country whose principal mission is to support Democratic House candidates every step of the way to fortify and to expand our the Democratic Majority"
ReplyDelete___________
Anyone watching the zoo tonight?
ReplyDeletenope
ReplyDeleteI am going for wrestling. You can tell the fake people better by watching experts at work.
ReplyDeleteit's just going to be a repeat of the last one :)
ReplyDeleteBesides.... kinda got a glimpse already with the headlines....
ReplyDeleteRemember Obamacare?.... well now Kamala Harris is wanting to introduce KamalaCare!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/harris-reveals-kamalacare-health-plan
These anti American, socialistic demons only want to destroy America.
I love my president. People may see it as he just has diarrhea of the mouth.
ReplyDeleteNope.
A long time ago I saw what he was doing on Twitter. His statements are followed by a mass reaction. That reaction, is exactly what we need.
Like some folks I questioned the timing, and the wording of some of those tweets by our president. Not anymore.
Just by tweeting he's gonna be responsible for primary losses for some dems. Maybe two election cycles, if not three.
He put the "four morons of the apocalypse" front and center. They are now the face of the DNC. Now the DCCC, like Rikki pointed out is hemmoraging. All while the #walkaway movement still takes place.
He now has put Baltimore, or any urban hostile, mismanaged by career democrats and burying our fellow Americans of color.
All by himself.
No Republicans out front, and only a few that act like they are in his corner after the punches have been thrown.
My president knows how to fight.
My president knows how to win.
He said what he going to do, and dam sure trying to do it.
And the dems are in disarray, because of him.
KAG 2020!!!
Edit*
Delete"He now has put Baltimore, or any urban hostile, mismanaged by career democrats and burying our fellow Americans of color, front and center."
https://youtu.be/uCcz0cVY1t8
ReplyDeleteHey Blue. Maybe you would like a black man's perspective on Baltimore.
Ain't far from DC, ya know.
You welcome.
Always here to help.
Well Good night room 235...
ReplyDeleteGood morning room 235...
ReplyDeleteG'morning Sarge & everyone
ReplyDeletegot 'donut shop' blend in the coffee mug this morning :)
On the Washington Times website this morning, I see this:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jul/30/judge-john-koeltl-tosses-democrats-case-against-tr/
Judge tosses Democrats' case against Trump 2016 campaign
By Larry Neumeister - Associated Press - Tuesday, July 30, 2019
NEW YORK — Democrats’ claims that President Donald Trump’s campaign conspired with Russia were tossed out Tuesday by a judge who noted there were no allegations that anyone from the campaign stole documents from the Democratic National Committee.
The lawsuit brought by the committee alleged that Trump’s campaign conspired with Russia, WikiLeaks, Trump’s son-in-law and others. Trump’s campaign and lawyers for the other defendants denied the allegations.
U.S. District Judge John G. Koeltl said Russia was “undoubtably” the primary wrongdoer in the alleged criminal enterprise, but the country can’t be sued in U.S. courts except in special circumstances not present in this case.
Meanwhile, he said the actions of the Trump campaign and others were protected by the First Amendment.
“In sum, the DNC does not allege any facts to show plausibly that any of the defendants, other than the Russia Federation, had any role in hacking the DNC’s computers or stealing its information,” Koeltl wrote. “It attributes that conduct only to the Russian Federation.
"And the DNC does not dispute that the documents were of public importance. Therefore, the First Amendment protects the publication of those stolen documents,” the judge said.
The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, and the American Civil Liberties Union had submitted written arguments supporting defendant WikiLeaks‘ request that the lawsuit be tossed.
In support of his findings, Koeltl cited the Pentagon Papers case in which the U.S. Supreme Court concluded that The New York Times and the Washington Post were constitutionally protected when they published stories about a top-secret study that revealed the U.S. government misled the public about the Vietnam War.
In emails, several lawyers for people and groups named in the suit reacted to Koeltl’s decision. Emails seeking comment were sent to attorneys for the DNC.
Grant Smith, a lawyer for longtime Trump friend Roger Stone, said he was pleased the judge “saw through the Democrats’ thin lawsuit. It was always a Hail Mary in the DNC’s attempt to hold people, and in particular our client Roger Stone, responsible for the loss of Hilary Clinton in the 2016 election.”
Caroline Polisi, representing ex-Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos, said the lawsuit’s claims about her client were “particularly anemic and bordered on the absurd.”
Joshua Dratel, an attorney for WikiLeaks, said he was “very gratified with the result, which reaffirms First Amendment principles that apply to journalists across the board, whether they work for large institutions or small independent operations.”
________
New York is mainly known to be a Democrat state.... and now this gem..... Judge John Koeltl was nominated by then President Bill Clinton.....
and this UNCONSTITUTIONAL BULLSHIT.....
ReplyDeletehttps://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jul/30/gavin-newsom-california-governor-signs-bill-aimed-/
Gavin Newsom signs bill aimed at keeping Trump off 2020 primary ballot
By Kathleen Ronayne and Adam Beam - Associated Press - Tuesday, July 30, 2019
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California’s Democratic governor signed a law Tuesday requiring presidential candidates to release their tax returns to appear on the state’s primary ballot, a move aimed squarely at Republican President Donald Trump.
______
My 2 cents worth and then some.....
The Republican States needs to pass legislation to prohibit left wing extremists peddling anti-Isreal propaganda and more importantly..... prohibit socialist bullshit.
can you tell that the caffeine has kicked in??
ReplyDelete(smiles)
I'll check back in after a while....
ReplyDeletemore coffee beckons :)
Good Morning Again :)
ReplyDeletePart 1 of 2
just checking back in....
The Star Tribune (Minneapolis, Minnesota) newspaper website.... found this on last nights dummycrat debate debacle...
http://www.startribune.com/ap-fact-check-examining-claims-from-2020-democratic-debate/513416932/
AP FACT CHECK: Off notes from Democrats on climate, economy
By CALVIN WOODWARD and HOPE YEN Associated Press JULY 31, 2019 — 7:25AM
WASHINGTON — Democratic presidential contenders struck off notes on the science of global warming and the state of the economy in their Detroit debate Tuesday night.
As much as scientists see the need for action on climate change, they don't lay out a looming point of no return , as Pete Buttigieg and Beto O'Rourke asserted. Bernie Sanders almost certainly overstated how much new income is soaked up by the richest Americans.
A look at some of their statements in the opening night of the second round of debates, with 10 more Democrats taking the stage Wednesday:
CLIMATE
BETO O'ROURKE, former U.S. representative from Texas, on global warming: "I listen to scientists on this and they're very clear: We don't have more than 10 years to get this right. And we won't meet that challenge with half-steps, half-measures or only half the country."
PETE BUTTIGIEG, mayor of South Bend, Indiana: "Science tells us we have 12 years before we reach the horizon of our catastrophe when it comes to our climate."
THE FACTS: Scientists don't agree on an approximate time frame, let alone an exact number of years, for how much time we have left to stave off the deadliest extremes of climate change.
A report by the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, drawn from the work of hundreds of scientists, uses 2030 as a prominent benchmark because signatories to the Paris climate change agreement have pledged emission cuts by then. But it's not a last-chance, hard deadline for action, as O'Rourke, Buttigieg and others have interpreted it.
"The hotter it gets, the worse it gets, but there is no cliff edge," James Skea, co-chairman of the report, told The Associated Press.
Climate scientists certainly see the necessity for broad and immediate action to address global warming, but they do not agree that 2030 is a "point of no return," as Buttigieg put it.
"This has been a persistent source of confusion," agreed Kristie L. Ebi, director of the Center for Health and the Global Environment at the University of Washington in Seattle. "The report never said we only have 12 years left."
Part 2 of 2
ReplyDeleteJOHN HICKENLOOPER, former Colorado governor: When it comes to fighting climate change, "What we do here is a best practice and a template that's got to be done all over the world. ... We need every country working together if we're going to deal with climate change in a real way."
THE FACTS: The nations most concerned with climate change certainly do not consider the U.S. a "template" for a solution. Americans per capita are among the world's biggest emitters of climate-changing carbon. The U.S. is also the top oil and natural gas producer, pumping out more fossil fuels on the front end.
On Hickenlooper's point about needing all countries working together, the U.S. under President Donald Trump is withdrawing from the Paris climate accord , a voluntary commitment by countries to combat climate-changing emissions.
___
BERNIE SANDERS, Vermont senator: "49 percent of all new income is going to the top 1 percent."
THE FACTS: That is surely exaggerated. The figure comes from a short paper by Emmanuel Saez, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley, and leading researcher on inequality, and doesn't include the value of fringe benefits, such as health insurance, or the effects of taxes and government benefit programs such as Social Security.
But Saez and another Berkeley economist, Gabriel Zucman, have recently compiled a broader data set that does include those items and finds the top 1% has captured roughly 25% of the income growth since the recession ended. That's certainly a lot lower but still a substantial share. Income inequality has sharply increased in the past four decades, but since the recession, data from the Congressional Budget Office shows that it has actually narrowed slightly.
___
SANDERS: Benefits under his health care plan "will be better because 'Medicare for All' is comprehensive and covers all health care needs."
THE FACTS: On paper, the Vermont senator is right. In real life, if he's elected president, the result might be quite different.
Sanders' "Medicare for All" bill calls for a government plan that would cover all medical care, prescriptions, dental and vision care, mental health and substance abuse treatment, and home and community-based long-term care services with virtually no copays or deductibles. The only exception would be a modest copay for certain high-cost medications.
But other countries with national health care plans are not as generous with benefits and also make use of copays to manage costs. Canada, often held up as a model by Sanders, does not have universal coverage for prescription drugs. Canadians rely on a mix of private insurance and public plans to pay for their prescriptions.
If Sanders is elected president, a Congress grappling with how to pass his plan may well pare back some of its promises. So there's no guarantee that benefits "will be better" for everybody, particularly people who now have the most generous health insurance.
___
TIM RYAN, U.S. representative from Ohio: "The economic system that used to create 30, 40, 50 dollar-an-hour jobs that you could have a good solid middle class living now forces us to have two or three jobs just to get by."
THE FACTS: Most Americans, by far, only work one job, and the numbers who juggle more than one have declined over a quarter century.
In the mid-1990s, the percentage of workers holding multiple jobs peaked at 6.5%. The rate dropped significantly, even during the Great Recession, and has been hovering for a nearly a decade at about 5% or a little lower. In the latest monthly figures, from June, 5.2% of workers were holding more than one job.
Hispanic and Asian workers are consistently less likely than white and black workers to be holding multiple jobs. Women are more likely to be doing so than men.
In brief...Beto O’Rourke, Pete Buttigieg, lied.
ReplyDeleteJohn Hickenlooper lied....
Bernie Sanders “exaggerated”…. May as well say he lied too....
Tim Ryan...Well you can say he stretched the truth a bit....(i.e. exaggerated i.e. lied too).
Haven't seen a fact check yet on the others from last night.
Well I now see I didn't miss a damn thing not watching the socialist Commies last night. But Tucker and Hannity were great...
ReplyDeleteI didn't watch it either Sarge.... figured the newspapers this morning would have enough of the highlights - it takes a lot less time to skim the headlines & articles than it does to watch the clown circus.
DeleteThe Democrats who have been pushing Global Warming.... well... there's a hob knobbing going on in Sicily, Italy.... their means of transportation..... yep...
ReplyDeleteprivate jets and mega yachts!
The Global Warming folks are nothing but hypocrites..... but we already knew that.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/climate-activist-celebrities-arrive-at-google-camp-by-yachts-helicopters-and-private-jets
Climate activist celebrities arrive at 'Google Camp' by yachts, helicopters, and private jets
by Ellie Bufkin | July 31, 2019 11:54 AM
and helicopters~ of course they must be a new kind of transportation.... running green!
ReplyDeletehee hee.... this headline made me giggle!
ReplyDeletehttps://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/455544-lawsuit-filed-over-rejected-wtf-political-party-in-nevada
Lawsuit filed over rejected 'WTF' political party in Nevada
BY CHRIS MILLS RODRIGO - 07/31/19 12:43 PM EDT
In doing a little digging on the WTF Political Party…. This is what I basically found out.
ReplyDeleteI found an article written in July of 2017.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/07/the-wtf-plan-to-disrupt-politics-is-everything-thats-wrong-with-silicon-valley
"THE “WTF” PLAN TO DISRUPT POLITICS IS EVERYTHING THAT’S WRONG WITH SILICON VALLEY"
"No, the Internet will not save the Democratic Party."
Just my 2 cents worth and then some..... they are still Democrats!
DeleteHere's something that should be investigated..... one of the Freshman Brat Brigade bitches received an illegal contribution!
ReplyDeleteHere's the link:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/tlaib-receives-donation-from-prominent-michigan-businessman-whos-been-dead-for-a-decade
Rashida Tlaib received donation from prominent Michigan businessman who's been dead for a decade
by Hunter Lovell | July 31, 2019 05:10 PM
___________________________________________
(the time 5:10 pm is Eastern Daylight Time)
____________________________________________
Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib received a $2,500 campaign contribution from a prominent Michigan businessman who died more than 10 years ago, Federal Election Commission filings show.
George S. Farah, Sr., a real estate developer and community leader in Flint, Michigan, made the large donation on June 22. However, Michigan Live reported he died of heart failure at the age of 73 on Feb. 1, 2009.
According to a scan of public records by the Washington Free Beacon, Farah is listed as deceased, and the address linked to his name is the same one registered on the contribution to Tlaib's campaign. Farah's widow also lives at that address, Grand Blanc Township property records reveal.
Only one other politician has received a campaign contribution from Farah in the decade since his passing. Democratic Michigan Rep. Dan Kildee received $1,400 in total donations from Farah between 2011 and 2017. Farah made no such contributions to political candidates while he was alive.
It is illegal for individuals to make campaign donations under someone else's name, according to campaign finance law.
"It is illegal to make a campaign contribution in the name of another person and a campaign must ensure all donor information is reported accurately," Kendra Arnold, executive director of the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust, told the Free Beacon. "The requirement of accurate disclosure of campaign contributors is important to inform voters of the source of campaign funds, prevent corruption, and ensure individuals are contributing within the legal limits."
A spokesperson for Kildee's campaign told the Free Beacon that "Gisele Farah is the sole beneficiary of a trust in her late husband's name, George S. Farah Sr., who passed away in 2009."
"Since his death, Gisele Farah, as the sole beneficiary in control of the trust, has contributed to the campaign with funds from her trust," the spokesperson added. "Our campaign's records have been amended to clarify that the campaign contributions were from Gisele Farah and should be designated under her name."
It is not uncommon for a deceased person to make donations to campaigns. According to USA Today, dead people made 32 contributions adding up to $586,000 that were given to political candidates and parties between January 2009 and August 2013.
"It is illegal for individuals to make campaign donations under someone else's name, according to campaign finance law."
ReplyDeleteThis bitch needs to get the boot out of Washington!!
Well, I guess we all knew Comey was a piece of crap.
ReplyDeletehttps://thehill.com/opinion/judiciary/455616-james-comeys-next-reckoning-is-imminent-this-time-for-leaking?amp
Again, before I head out. Hate on me if you will, but the presidents Twitter is 🔥
ReplyDeleteJust want to reiterate how important his public rebuke is. The reaction to top man in the US Navy being called out for awards to slimy traitorous prosecutors in the Gallagher trial?
Priceless.
Those reactions?
Votes.
Good night all!
Sounds damn good to me, Hammer, and I also say good night room 235...
DeleteGood morning room 235...
ReplyDeleteWell guess it is a good time to try again... Z's
ReplyDeleteGlad I didn't waste a bunch of time watching the debate last night.
ReplyDeleteAs usual there was nothing new. Just a bunch of socialists trying to out socialist each other.
The choice in 2020 is crystal clear...
Scanning through the headlines I see they attacked Obama. Promised to eliminate fossil fuels and the millions of jobs that come with it. One guy vowed to give every American family $1,000 a month.
ReplyDeleteWhat they didn't talk about nor were they asked about was the economy.
But when your goal is to wreck it I doubt you would want to go on record saying so...
did you catch where "I AM SPARTACUS" Booker said that the Republicans and Russians suppressed the African American voters in Michigan and that's why the Democrats lost Michigan?
ReplyDeleteLike y'all, I didn't watch the debates, I'm just skimming this morning's headlines.
I didn't watch the debate either. Caught some of the stuff on the regular Fox shows last night. I did see where Tulsi Gabbard was slamming Harris pretty good on her prosecutorial practices in California. In my opinion, Gabbard would probably be their strongest candidate against Donald Trump if she gains traction. Female, Veteran, young, smart, and forgive me ladies for this politically incorrect statement, "Not too bad to look at, at all"! Anyway, we will see! Doesn't look like Biden hurt himself too much last night. Don Lemon, the CNN "opinion" guy on the panel, showed his usually bias "STUPID". All in all, another good night for President Trump!
ReplyDeleteWell I just got my Betsy Ross T-shirt from the Rush Limbaugh Show, great quality and money goes to wounded warriors. Materials feel's like a fine silk.A+++++++++++++
ReplyDeleteWell just as I thought Nothing will ever come of any of this. They may get some poor slob on the bottom on the totem pole but all the swamp dwellers will walk.
ReplyDeleteDOJ will not prosecute Comey for leaking memos after IG referral:
That's on Hold Skipper Barr is only waiting and gathering more before he charges Comey, Trust me Comey is going down... Barr is on top of this...
DeleteThis is an outrage, agreed. But AG Barr has his reasons.... inasmuch as this is an outrage.... it could be that AG Barr is getting his "ducks in a row" so Comey ain't out of the woods just yet.
Deletehttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/lindsey-graham-stunning-if-doj-declined-to-prosecute-james-comey
Delete"Graham praised Barr's "prosecutorial discretion," and looked ahead to the other internal investigations that could be news for Comey.
"And if he does bring a charge against Comey after doing this, I'd hate to be Comey," he said."
On an "un-related" note:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/08/01/brett-kavanaugh-panel-clears-supreme-court-justice-misconduct/1890673001/
Federal judicial panel dismisses misconduct charges against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh
Richard Wolf, USA TODAY Published 2:33 p.m. ET Aug. 1, 2019
WASHINGTON – Supreme Court Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh cannot be disciplined for his behavior during last year's calamitous Senate confirmation battle, a federal judiciary panel ruled Thursday.
The decision by the Committee on Judicial Conduct and Disability of the Judicial Conference of the United States agreed with a panel of federal judges that Kavanaugh's elevation to the Supreme Court put him out of their jurisdiction.
"Our committee, judicial councils, and chief circuit judges all lack statutory authority to review the merits of complaints against an individual no longer covered under the (Judicial Conduct and Disability) Act," the panel said. "As a Supreme Court justice, Justice Kavanaugh is not a judge subject to the Act."
The action followed last December's dismissal of 83 ethics complaints against Kavanaugh by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, which had been asked to conduct an investigation. The complaints alleged that he violated the code of conduct for federal judges in part by "making inappropriately partisan statements and behaving in a demonstrably hostile manner during the hearings" last year, as well as in 2004 and 2006 for a federal appeals court seat.
Kavanaugh, 54, was confirmed by a 50-48 Senate vote last October after surviving Christine Blasey Ford's allegation of sexual misconduct while he was a high school student in the 1980s.
As President Donald Trump's second nominee following Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch in 2017, the Maryland resident kept a low profile in his first term. He voted with the majority of justices more often than any of his colleagues and agreed with Chief Justice John Roberts 94% of the time.
I'm pretty sure that Barr has a plan Skip! I'm also pretty sure that he, the IG, and the special investigator are way ahead of us on what they know at this time. The proof will be in the pudding or hopefully a shit sandwich for Comey and his crew!
ReplyDelete~ Health Alert for American Men ~
ReplyDeleteIf you are taking Viagra, make sure the label says "Made in USA".
We do not want the Russians meddling in our erections. Just Saying... :)
New blog up.
ReplyDelete