First off I'd like to thank a long time supporter and friend of this little Underground Bunker of ours, Rikki for bringing this story to our attention in the last edition of Room 235.
Evidently since every single thing they've tried has failed to bring about the destruction of President Trump the dems have gone back into their stupid bag of tricks and are once again trying to discredit him due to mental instability.
Of course they've pulled this same stunt before but you gotta remember we're dealing with very stupid and mentally unstable people here.
Democrats plan Capitol Hill event to put Trump's mental health under fire
Democrats are planning to host a Capitol Hill event featuring psychiatrists who will warn that President Trump is unfit for office based on his mental health.
The event will be led by Dr. Bandy Lee, a Yale School of Medicine psychiatrist and editor of The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump, a book that argues psychiatrists have a responsibility to warn the public when a president is dangerous. The position is controversial because psychiatric associations urge members never to diagnose patients they haven't personally evaluated, saying it undermines the scientific rigor of the profession.
But Lee and others who agree with her stance say that their description of the president's behavior, of his showing mental instability and dangerousness, shouldn't be interpreted as issuing a diagnosis.
Hey, I have an idea.
Let's take a look at the deranged and mentally unstable side of the aisle.
Then let's discuss who's out of their flipping minds.
Deal?
This was the day before it all began.
This was the day before it all began.
And it's been downhill ever since.
I rest me case...
Kevin McGinty
Be fun to see a before and a now history of those two libtards. They no doubt didn't have a life before. Just wondering what kind of life they have now. More than likely on welfare.
ReplyDeleteThank you Kevin.
ReplyDeleteThe dummycrats have been in a severe melt down for so long, they don't realize that they have been putting themselves on display and the whole of America is really tired of their junk.
The media plays up to them by putting them on display. Trying to sway public opinion that there's more of them than Trump supporters. You can just bet that we will be seeing a lot more of this from the dummycrats and after they lose in 2020, their melt down will be displayed in worse epic proportions.
I find their invasion of his personal health is in poor taste and it is a disgrace. I remember something similar happened to Goldwater and he brought a lawsuit against the accusers. Shows how low they will go, but their actions will backfire and the haters will be exposed.
ReplyDeleteGood morning Rose!! I have never in my life time seen this much Hate for one man, they are some sick people...
ReplyDeleteUnless they can prove scientific evidence about Trumps mental health then their assessment will prove it is a bunch of garbage and just another political witch hunt. They can't PROVE squat.
ReplyDeleteGood Grief we have a storm right over Topeka just heard the thunder. Well going to check out the News...
ReplyDeleteThunder rolls. Stay safe.
ReplyDeleteAnd I agree with you about their hate for Trump. But you know what they say about burning coals on the head. It is eating them up with all their hatred.
I hope he brings a libel suite against them.
ReplyDeleteSuit not suite.
ReplyDeleteActually I think he could bring a slander and libel suit against them since they wrote it and told it. All lies.
ReplyDeleteI better go back and get a few more Z's. Later
ReplyDeleteWell back up from those Z's..
ReplyDeleteNancy Pelosi has gone way beyond delusional - check this out!
ReplyDeletehttps://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/5/nancy-pelosi-doesnt-want-donald-trump-impeached-i-/
"Nancy Pelosi doesn't want Trump impeached: 'I want to see him in prison'"
By Victor Morton - The Washington Times - Wednesday, June 5, 2019
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi might not be the most enthusiastic supporter of impeaching President Trump; she reportedly wants a far worse fate.
According to a report Wednesday evening in Politico, Mrs. Pelosi told her fellow Democrats that she wants to see Mr. Trump behind bars.
Mrs. Pelosi upped the ante at a Tuesday night private meeting with other top Democrats to settle strategy and turf issues on whether to impeach the president, a path about which Mrs. Pelosi has been publicly dubious and remained so at the meeting.
“I don’t want to see him impeached, I want to see him in prison,” Mrs. Pelosi said, Politico reported, citing “multiple Democratic sources familiar with the meeting.”
The sources told Politico that the speaker’s preferred strategy is to have Mr. Trump defeated in the 2020 election and, once out of office, prosecuted by a Justice Department no longer hamstrung by the constitutional difficulties a criminal probe of a sitting president creates.
A major part of Mrs. Pelosi’s opposition to impeachment is that it wouldn’t remove Mr. Trump from office, unless two-thirds of the Senate agreed to convict him. The Republican-majority chamber shows very little to no inclination to do that, she and many political observers have argued. A criminal prosecution would not be so constrained.
Pelosi spokeswoman Ashley Etienne gave Politico a non-committal response.
The speaker and her panel chairs “had a productive meeting about the state of play with the Mueller report. They agreed to keep all options on the table and continue to move forward with an aggressive hearing and legislative strategy, as early as next week, to address the president’s corruption and abuses of power uncovered in the report,” Ms. Etienne said.
____________
Well, I still feel that the Democrats will lose control of the House which will force the old hag out and she'll have to relinquish the gavel.
ReplyDeleteAll of America spoke loudly against the shenanigans of the dummycrats when they voted for Donald Trump. It will happen again in 2020.
So glad to see that you are still with us Rikki!
ReplyDeleteI hear all of this about them wanting to impeach, wanting to put him in Prison, suggesting that he is mentally unfit to serve, and all that I can do is ask myself, "Exactly for what?" They have yet, in my opinion given any concrete reason for doing any or all of the above, except for the only fact that he beat their candidate, and they can't stand that he is President, so he must pay! What else do they have?
For a bunch of supposedly well raised, well educated, compassionate elitists, they are more stupid than a box of Hair! If Trump were to walk on water, this bunch would berate him because he couldn't swim! What a bunch of losers! MAGA 2020 President Trump!
Well Gary these Commie democrats are doing what Hitler couldn't do... It is a disgrace.
ReplyDeleteThank you Gary :)
ReplyDeleteWhat is really delusional is how the dummycrats think they are the ones in charge - that what they say goes.... totally delusional.
oh this is juicy - now if they can take this one step further and indict AOC!
ReplyDeletehttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/federal-election-commission-probing-financial-discrepancies-at-aoc-political-action-committee
Federal Election Commission investigating financial discrepancies at AOC political action committee
by Alana Goodman | June 06, 2019 07:00 AM
The Federal Election Commission is examining financial discrepancies at a political action committee that was run by Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez after an outside watchdog group raised questions about the group’s spending activities.
Justice Democrats PAC, a committee where Ocasio-Cortez served on the board until last summer, said in financial reports that it helped pay off candidate debts that did not appear to exist, according to a May 30 letter from the FEC cited by the Washington Free Beacon.
The FEC asked the PAC to explain the discrepancies, request refunds from the campaigns that allegedly received the payments, and update its financial statements, noting that the commission “may take further legal action regarding this impermissible activity.”
Justice Democrat PAC’s financial report for April 1, 2018, to June 30, 2018, “discloses one or more contributions to federal candidates for the retirement of debts incurred by the 2018 Primary election campaign,” according to the FEC letter.
“[H]owever, it appears that the recipient committee(s) had insufficient debts to warrant such a contribution,” said the commission. “Please note that a committee may only designate contributions to retire a candidate's debts if those debts exist.”
The FEC questioned the PAC’s payments to 11 Democratic campaigns, including Texas congressional candidates Ricardo Jose Trevino and Jimmy Darnell Jones, and Illinois congressional candidate Sameena Mustafa.
The commission also asked Justice Democrats to explain reimbursements it said it received from seven campaigns that did not correspond with any payments made by the PAC. The commission said the group must respond to the letter by July 5 or it could result in enforcement action.
Ocasio-Cortez has said she stepped down from the board of the Justice Democrats PAC at the end of June 2018 and would have still been part of the group’s leadership when most of the debt payments were made.
Her chief of staff, Saikat Chakrabarti, co-founded Justice Democrats and also served on the board.
Justice Democrats PAC did not respond to request for comment by press time. A spokesperson for Ocasio-Cortez did not respond to request for comment by press time.
The Washington Examiner first reported that Justice Democrats and another PAC co-founded by Chakrabarti called Brand New Congress made payments of over $1 million to an LLC controlled by Chakrabarti. The National Legal and Policy Center, a government watchdog group, filed a complaint asking the FEC to investigate the payments.
The FEC has yet to indicate if it is pursuing an investigation of the NLPC complaint. But the Justice Democrats PAC’s payments to Chakrabarti’s company, which were described as consulting fees to help build infrastructure for Democratic campaigns, raised eyebrows with campaign finance experts. "None of that makes any sense," said Adav Noti, the senior director of the Campaign Legal Center and a former FEC lawyer. "I can't even begin to disentangle that. They're either confused or they're trying to conceal something."
___________________
Concealment is what and only thing they are good at...
ReplyDeleteyou're right.
ReplyDeleteI know. :)
ReplyDelete1 of 3
ReplyDeleteJust saw this on Washington Times!
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jun/6/fbi-wiretap-petitions-trump-campaign-contained-key/
"FBI wiretap petitions for Trump campaign contained key errors"
By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times - Thursday, June 6, 2019
Four FBI wiretap applications targeting a Trump campaign volunteer were more inaccurate than previously known based on subsequent investigative information, an analysis shows.
The FBI applications to federal judges under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) are a central focus of the Justice Department’s special review of how the Obama administration started its probe into the Donald Trump campaign.
Obtaining four surveillance warrants on Carter Page from October 2016 to September 2017 was one of the FBI’s most aggressive steps to try to prove that Trump associates conspired with the Kremlin to interfere in the 2016 election. The FBI asserted that Mr. Page was a foreign agent for Russia and helped it interfere in the election.
In the end, special counsel Robert Mueller’s March report said that his 22-month investigation didn’t find any such conspiracy. He essentially cleared Mr. Page.
The FISA warrants first came to public light in July 2018, when the FBI reluctantly declassified 412 pages of four highly redacted applications signed by senior FBI and Justice Department officials.
At the time they were released, Republicans leveled two main complaints: dubious corroboration of allegations against Mr. Page and the FBI’s use of Democratic Party opposition research, known as the dossier, to justify spying on the Trump campaign.
President Trump approved the release based on efforts by Rep. Devin Nunes, California Republican and then-chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Mr. Nunes’ principal complaint was that agents relied on the 35-page dossier compiled by ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, who was paid with funds from the Hillary Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party.
What is known more fully today about the FISA applications’ accuracy comes from three main sources: a formal investigation by congressional Republicans into FBI actions, the Mueller report and court filings by Mr. Steele in London. He is being sued by Russians named in his infamous dossier.
Here are six FISA application discrepancies, based on an analysis by The Washington Times. The applications state at the beginning that they are “verified.” The four documents were submitted to a FISA judge under penalty of perjury.
Part 2 of 3
ReplyDelete⦁ The FBI told judges the bureau had “closed Mr. Steele out as an active source” after agents discovered he violated its rules and leaked information to a news outlet right before the election.
This is misleading. The Republican investigation showed that the FBI continued to solicit and rely on Mr. Steele via two go-betweens — a special agent and Justice Department official Bruce Ohr — well into 2017.
⦁ Fusion GPS, Mrs. Clinton’s opposition research firm that handled Mr. Steele, never told the British ex-spy the “motivation” behind the investigation into Mr. Trump’s ties to Russia, the FBI told judges.
But Mr. Steele appeared to have a firm understanding that his work was partisan, according to his August 2018 court filing. His research was to help Mrs. Clinton file a legal challenge if she lost the Nov. 8 election. The challenge would be based on Russia helping Mr. Trump.
Mr. Steele was paid by the law firm Perkins Coie, which represented the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party.
Mr. Steele declared in court: “Fusion’s immediate client was law firm Perkins Coie. It engaged Fusion to obtain information necessary for Perkins Coie LLP to provide legal advice on the potential impact of Russian involvement on the legal validity of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election. Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC Inc. (also known as Hillary for America) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that election.”
In addition, Mr. Steele took his dossier material in October 2016 to a senior State Department official. According to a State Department memo, he said his research was “at the behest of an institution he declined to identify that had been hacked.”
This would suggest Mr. Steele knew he was working for Democrats whose computers were hacked by Russians.
Part 3 of 3
ReplyDelete⦁ As corroboration of Mr. Steele’s allegations, the FBI cited a Sept. 23, 2016 Yahoo News story that essentially said the same thing — that Mr. Page had met with two high-level associates of Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow to discuss removing U.S.-imposed sanctions on Russian oligarchs and businesses. Mr. Steele said Mr. Page agreed in exchange for a brokerage fee — in other words, a bribe.
The FBI told the judges that Mr. Steele wasn’t a source for the story because Mr. Steele said he only provided his information to Fusion.
“The FBI does not believe that [Steele] directly provided this information to the identified news organization that published the September 23rd news article,” the FBI told the judge.
The FBI was wrong. Mr. Steele was the exclusive Yahoo source, so there was no corroboration.
By the time the FBI filed its fourth wiretap request in June 2017, it had ample opportunity to find out that Mr. Steele had in fact contacted the press in Washington.
He filed a declaration in a London court in April that read: “Save that it is admitted that the Second Defendant [Mr. Steele] gave off the record briefings to a small number of journalists about the pre-election memoranda in late summer/autumn 2016.”
One of the reporters he briefed, Michael Isikoff, wrote the Yahoo story.
That declaration became public in an April 25 story in The Washington Times, headlined “Christopher Steele admits dossier charge unverified.”
ok, it stretched to 4... so this is 4 of 4
ReplyDeleteThe story was widely circulated. The Times published the Steele document. The FBI had weeks to review the Steele case in London and amend its June application to reflect that Mr. Steele had spoken to reporters before the Yahoo story ran.
⦁ The FBI never told judges that Democrats funded Mr. Steele.
Instead, the FBI wrote in all four applications, including the June 2017 one: “The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. person [Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS] was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate #l’s campaign.”
Former FBI Director James B. Comey testified to Congress in December 2018 that he knew Democrats funded the dossier before the first FISA application was submitted in October 2016.
⦁ The FBI told judges that Mr. Page coordinated with Russia to influence the election.
“The FBI believes that Page has been collaborating and conspiring with the Russian government,” the FBI said in the FISA application.
“The FBI believes that the Russian Government’s efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. Presidential election were being coordinated with Page and perhaps other individuals associated with Candidate,” the FBI told judges.
These may be a reference to Mr. Steele’s allegation that former campaign manager Paul Manafort and Mr. Page worked together with the Kremlin.
In fact, no evidence ever surfaced that the two men knew each other, much less worked tougher.
Months later, the Mueller report found no such conspiracy.
“The investigation did not establish that Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election,” Mr. Mueller said.
⦁ The FBI told FISA judges that Mr. Steele was “credible” based on previous research as a paid human source.
The applications’ uncensored sections don’t disclose that the FBI did a report card on Mr. Steele. It said it had only “minimally corroborated” the dossier and had only “medium confidence” in his work.
The grade was contained in a “Human Source Validation Report,” a copy of which was obtained by The Washington Times under an open-records request.
The assessment was written after the FBI fired Mr. Steele in November 2016.
In closing his case, Mr. Mueller came to this conclusion regarding Mr. Steele’s dozen or so felony accusations against Mr. Trump and associates that had circulated in the Obama administration: “The investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
Today, the dossier and Mr. Steele have gone from FBI source to an investigative focus.
Attorney General William Barr, alarmed that the Obama administration put the Trump campaign under investigation, has tapped John Durham, the U.S. attorney for Connecticut, to review how the FBI conducted the probe.
“These counterintelligence activities that were directed at the Trump campaign were not done in the normal course and not through the normal procedures, as far as I can tell,” Mr. Barr told CBS News on Friday.
There are conflicting media reports that Mr. Steele has agreed or refused to meet with Mr. Durham in London.
The first dossier verdict will likely come from Michael Horowitz, the Justice Department’s inspector general. He has been investigating what Republicans call “FISA abuse” since last year.
At one time, Mr. Trump was set to declassified larger FISA application portions. But he backed off in September 2018 partly because allies objected.
That would indicate that the FBI tapped Western intelligence sources to fill out the wiretap applications.
YUP AND ALL THIS SHIT IS GOING TO COME OUT UNDER THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT RUN BY Barr, you can bank on that.
ReplyDeleteI want AG Barr to be totally thorough in his investigations, but I also want this wrapped up, key dummycrats in jail for treason and other related crimes, and to finally move forward!!!
ReplyDeleteSounds like a plan to me. I sure it is moving right along.
ReplyDeleteMaybe Mexico is getting it now??
ReplyDeletehttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/mexico-blocks-1-000-migrant-caravan-ahead-of-trumps-tariff-deadline
"Mexico blocks 1,000-migrant caravan ahead of Trump's tariff deadline"
by Tim Pearce | June 06, 2019 01:02 PM
Mexico apprehended about 1,000 migrants after President Trump threatened to slap tariffs on the country over its lax border policies.
About 200 Mexican military police intercepted the caravan walking north along a highway in southern Mexico on Wednesday, according to the Associated Press. The migrants told officers they planned to travel to the U.S. and claim asylum.
Some migrants resisted and others fled into the forest on either side of the highway, but the vast majority of those in the caravan complied with orders from Mexican officials. Hundreds of migrants agreed to go to a migrant detention center.
At the detention center, the migrants will be processed and, if needed, be transported back to their home countries.
The mass arrest comes days before Trump plans to place 5% tariff on all Mexican imports. Last week, Trump threatened Mexico with tariffs starting at 5% on June 10 and increasing 5% each month up to 25% until Mexico restricts the flow of migrants traveling through it to the U.S.
Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador is answering Trump’s call for stricter border security. López Obrador has sent a delegation to meet with White House officials and appears to be tightening border enforcement. López Obrador said Thursday he expected a deal to be reached by the end of the day.
U.S. Customs and Border Patrol arrested the largest single group of migrants in its history last week, taking 1,036 people into custody.
_____
That is just a drop in the bucket Rikki, they got to do more way up on their border before they get into Mexico... Just saying...
ReplyDeleteagreed
ReplyDeleteSo this is what it is like to do nothing all day, very boring...
ReplyDeletewell, could be worse :)
ReplyDeleteblue could post some more of his fallible erroneous rhetoric... (lol)
Well to be honest that would effect me on bit. he is a complete Zero to me. :)
ReplyDeleteGood grief that should be wouldn't effect me one bit.
Deletesnicker snicker :)
ReplyDeleteI knew that is what you meant
Your fearless leader opines -
ReplyDelete"The event will be led by Dr. Bandy Lee, a Yale School of Medicine psychiatrist and editor of The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump, a book that argues psychiatrists have a responsibility to warn the public when a president is dangerous. The position is controversial because psychiatric associations urge members never to diagnose patients they haven't personally evaluated, saying it undermines the scientific rigor of the profession."
I thought I would help you out again since I had just discussed this matter. I mentioned the "Goldwater Rule" that was accepted by the American Psychiatric Association. It is considered unethical to provide a diagnosis without a face to face assessment. But nowhere... NOWHERE is Dr. Lee providing a diagnosis. But you conveniently ignore something perhaps more important: the role of Trump's cabinet in seeking a professional opinion vis a vis his mental health.
From the New York Daily News, Denis Slattery Sept. 6, 2018.
" White House officials reached out to a noted Yale University psychiatrist last fall out of concern over President Trump’s increasingly erratic behavior.
"Dr. Bandy Lee, who edited the best-selling book "The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President,” told the Daily News Thursday the staffers contacted her because the President was “scaring” them."
So, as usual, you have your facts wrong. The evil democrats did not sign this psychiatrist up to slam Trump. It was his own CABINET. Lee as well as many other psychiatrists have brought up the issue independently. Note in this excerpt, that Lee is joined by 27 other psychiatrist and mental health professionals. So she is far from alone.
It's bad enough to present with signs of serious neuroses, but as usual the draft dodging coward has managed to insult the mayor of London, Meghan Markle the wife of Prince Harry,( he called her 'nasty' ) and god only knows who else. Of course he denied everything, but frankly, he's crazy.
ReplyDeleteConsider the opinion of Dr. Lance Dodes, assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. (recently retired), as quoted in Salon, March 4, 2019.
Lance Dodes: "Mr. Trump is a sociopath, in that he meets every diagnostic criterion for the official diagnostic term “Antisocial Personality Disorder.” The fact that this is a personality disorder, rather than simply a single symptom such as anxiety or depression, means that all his actions are signs of this severe, continuous, mental disturbance.
To understand his actions, it is essential to keep in mind that sociopaths have only one goal: to enhance themselves, and that in pursuing their self-interest, they lack both normal human empathy for others and a normal human conscience. Cheating, conning, lying, stealing, threatening are all done with no remorse. "
While Prof. Dodes' broad observation of Trump's behavior could be seen as a breech of the "Goldwater Rule", he could argue that his observations are too broad to be considered a real diagnosis. But I suspect he wouldn't. He'd say the issues are too important, and the Goldwater Rule is nothing more than a gag order. There are in fact, significant efforts to do away with the rule altogether.
So... yes, Trump is the one with mental issues. While I question the legitimacy of Trump's presidency, he is the one in the Oval Office. Cathy Griffin on the other hand is not president.
And yet, posters here can't get enough of this carnival barker, this con man. But as LBJ famously put it
“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”
So the spread of ignorance is alive and well in Kansas. Got that McGinty - NO it was not the evil commie dems.. whatever bullshit you want to call them today who requested the assistance of Dr. Lee. That request came from the people who see him on a regular basis. God help us.
Well, now Ian's asking for God's help?
ReplyDeleteIan,
ReplyDeleteI know it is difficult for you to let go of your denial regarding your mental disorders. You really must have been abused as a child or adolescent so much so that you turned into a bully yourself. You have been so conditioned to behave so unjustifiably hateful and negative. Alas, all is not lost Ian. You can literally un-learn those behaviors with the assistance of a psychiatrist.
Since you mentioned that you live in the New England Area, here is a link to a psychiatric facility near you.
http://nementalhealth.com/
New England Center For Healthy Minds
Address: 289 Great Rd, Acton, MA 01720
Phone: (978) 679-1200
Proudly Deplorable, perhaps you're new to this blog - or you're just playing games. I went over this years ago. I live in the heart of Washington, D.C. with my wife. I attended Johns Hopkins, and continued to med school. My primary interest was and is neurology. I became a board certified neurologist with a particular interest in two areas : traumatic brain injury, and psychopharmacological research.Living in the Baltimore-Washington area I was well aware of what was going on here in those fields - arguably more than anyplace in the world. So I joined the Military Medical Service, after being recruited by the biological defense research directorate.
DeleteI split my time between Walter Reed, (what used to be known as Bethesda Naval Hosp). It is convenient in that it has its own subway station for Natl Institutes of Health and the National Library of Medicine. While having a 6 or 7 metro stop commute which I used now and then, is a nice perk. But I have the incredible opportunity to work with some of the most brilliant dedicated patriots in the country.
I am also engaged in biological defense research which for quite a few years has been located at Ft. Detrick, MD. Bethesda is inside the Beltway and far too close for such dangerous work. Ft. Detrick is 50 miles northwest of D.C.outside Frederick MD and on a MARC commuter line, not that I take it. I 270 against the traffic isn't too bad, and the outer suburbs are spreading closer to Frederick, an old colonial town, all the time. And it's always nice to see the mountains.
There is no way on God's green earth that I am letting my name, address, ANY personal information out. Not that I think any of you really can do much more than get out of bed and watch Fox. I know enough that my safety is always a concern. I live about 3 blocks in fact, from a Hotel that used to be called Jury's. More on that in a minute.
Back in 15, there was a murder of a Russian national in a nearby hotel. He wasn't just anybody. He was the founder of RT, and a close protégé of Putin himself. But that relationship went sour. Lesin fled to the US. The initial report back in '15 in the local press, indicated Lesin was drunk. Not a big surprise. Russia House is a top notch restaurant in this neighborhood, and a few years ago another Russia restaurant, Mari Vanna, also on Connecticut Ave, with 70 kinds of infused vodka opened. Both are favorites of Alex. Ovechkin who helped the Caps win the Stanley Cup. But the first report from the Metropolitan Police said Lesin just "fell in the tub, with a high etoh level". Okay, But slowly inside sources from the FBI which took over the investigation leaked this- his death was the result of multiple blunt trauma, and a broken neck. The Metropolitan Police of DC quietly backed out. More than a garden variety murder. How many times does someone fall in a tub, each time suffering trauma.... then have their neck broken ? Here is the link to the following article https://www.usagm.gov/2019/03/16/newly-obtained-lesin-files-reveal-neck-bone-fracture/
Delete"Newly obtained Lesin files reveal neck bone fracture March 16, 2019 WASHINGTON, D.C. — After a two-year court case, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) has won a Freedom Of Information Act lawsuit granting it exclusive access to medical records in the 2015 death of Mikhail Lesin, the creator of Russia Today.Among numerous revelations, the 149-page file, released to RFE/RL on March 15 by the Washington, D.C. Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, discloses for the first time that Lesin’s neck bone was completely fractured “at or near the time” of his death. The documents also reveal that the FBI had considered taking over the case in early 2016.The official autopsy had ruled Lesin’s death in a Dupont Circle hotel accidental, caused by blunt-force injuries amid excessive alcohol consumption.As Russian President Vladimir Putin’s press minister in the early 2000s, Lesin was instrumental in bringing the country’s national TV channels under government control and launching Russia Today, the global Kremlin mouthpiece known today as RT. He lost favor with the Kremlin sometime around 2012 and largely fell out of the public eye.Lesin’s links with Russia’s ruling elite, the circumstances of his demise, and a string of suspicious deaths of Russians across the globe have fueled persistent speculation that he may have been killed."
So take heed, it's not healthy to cross a two bit thug like Putin. His reach is long. Do I think I have information that the Russians might like to hear of ? No I don't think it, I know it.I don't entertain delusions of grandeur, but I'm no fool either. And mental disorders ? PD, stop being a sophomoric dolt. Grow up. No PD, I don't suffer any mental disorder, and reading your meandering rants, I can only shake my head.You really are in over your head.
When you have HIGHLY respected psychiatrists, and psychiatric organization sending up warning signs about this clown, and when you have confirmation that input from the psychiatric community that they began to look into Trump's behavior when his CABINET requested it, you had better be worried. Evidently they are. So... what do you do for a living Proudly Deplorable ?
PD you might be just a little to kind, take it from this crusty old man, just put his commie ass out of his misery. And move on. Oh just my opinion.:)
ReplyDeletelol Sargejr :)
ReplyDeleteHonesty is always best. That is a quality that the Democrats (including Ian) seriously lack in.
Ian does need some extensive psychiatric treatment though. His suffering is so extreme that his state of denial has clouded his better judgement.
Hahahha Well the mind is as you say may need extensive psychiatric treatment, but may I remind you we are talking about a commie son of a bitch liberal Ian, not much any one can do to help. But maybe you will get lucky...😂
DeleteLol... Asking for God's help on the heels of his beloved democrat party's vote to remove " So Help Me God" from their oath of office.
ReplyDeleteGood luck with that, Blue.
I mean you bastards did just kick him out...
Ian I have tried every approach possible to convince you of your mental disorders. I urge you to get some much needed help!
ReplyDeleteOn a side note Ian, the political party that you support has done great damage to this country. If Hillary CLinton had got in, the stress of the Office would have done her in and who would we be stuck with? The idiot Tim Kaine -
Maybe your ok with supporting a political party that lacks integrity, honesty, and true American heart - but those here that frequent this blog along with myself have had more than enough of the dirty political tricks that the Democrats play. So you and your corrupt dirty political party can take a flying leap to the depths below. Better take some sunscreen with you.
That was pithy. After what the repubs under Brownback did to Kansas you'd think Kansans would have learned. And I think many have. But not this group. It looks like most are living off SS, and Medicare, or close to it, and if nothing else, Kansas is as cheap as it gets. But to ignore the grotesque antics of this orange moron is sad. Not for me, but for you. I am convinced blue states will do just find PD. It's the cretins in the red states, you know, the ones propped up by blue ones, that will suffer. Your first comment was good for a chuckle, and your last just crude. I'll ask again, what do you do ? What's your academic background ? You must be proud of more than simply being deplorable. So go for it PD. And try hard not to sound like a complete fool.
DeleteFlying Leap PD? Good Grief' But I am not jumping and saying how I would have said that, you are a polite Guy and yes that is refreshing now and than. God Bless!
ReplyDeleteThank you Sargejr. God bless you also.
ReplyDeleteUntil another day.
Peace
Friday's blog up and running...
ReplyDelete